hi guys
if anyone can help me ,
i have 2 rb153 with 2 cm9 200 mw
each rb has one wlan
first i want to use 5ghz band with turbo but i cant see turbo mode to select ,second , should i use routing protocol ( rip , ospf ) to bridge the network or the bridge mode better than rip , ospf ?
third , 5ghz is better than 2.4 ?
how can i get much bandwidth with only one wlan on each rb ?
thank you guys
route if possible, no conntrack
I have PtP links running nstreme protocol with RB532 @8+8 Mb TCP “both” bandwidth. Is fair enough for all common uses, IMHO.
Your second question i’m not so much experiexnced about routing protocols… on your situation maybe i plain a bridge or a couple of static route entries to tell to ROS what are where.
And, AFAIK, 5ghz work well . Never had problems here, never used 2.4 except some scenarios with other products non-Mikrotik. And also in 2.4 cases until the frequency is free from others radio emissions, all works well.
Regards,
.:[CRT]:. wondering if nmap can kill a hotspot ?? 
You should be able to easily get that kind of throughput with a RB532 - I’m not sure about the RB153 though, as it has a much lower clock speed CPU.
I would use an RB532 on each end, with R52 radios (better than cm9) - providing that your distance (which you didn’t mention) is within the limits of their TX power and the antennas you’ve chosen.
Then, configure as necessary for your network. If it needs to be a routed link, set it up as routed. If it needs to be bridged, set it up as a WDS bridge. In my experience, a routed configuration will be faster.
To get 10Mbps unidirectional you’ll need to have a modulation rate of 18Mbps or better, to get 10Mbps bidrectional you’ll need to be up at 36Mbps or 48Mbps for reliable throughput, though your mileage may vary.
As far as 5Ghz vs 2.4Ghz, it really just depends where you are; my opinion is that in general 5Ghz is better because there is less noise, and the people using 5Ghz are generally more responsible with their RF.