Thanks @anserk, was reading all topic, your post http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/some-quick-comments-on-configuring-cake/152505/255 is very intresting.
Following your suggestions I ran some non-professional tests;
INTERNET QUEUE | QUEUE TREE | CAKE | BRDIGE → WAN | 500M | 7,5% CPU queue
/queue type add cake-ack-filter=filter cake-bandwidth=300M cake-diffserv=diffserv8 cake-flowmode=dual-srchost cake-nat=yes kind=cake name=“Egress”
/queue type add cake-bandwidth=500M cake-diffserv=diffserv8 cake-flowmode=dual-dsthost cake-nat=yes kind=cake name=“Ingress”
VLAN QUEUE | SIMPLE QUEUE (FastTrack disabled) | CAKE | GUEST → WAN | 50M | 4,8% CPU queue
/queue type add cake-bandwidth=10M cake-diffserv=besteffort cake-flowmode=dual-srchost kind=cake name=“UP” RTT=1
/queue type add cake-bandwidth=50M cake-diffserv=besteffort cake-flowmode=dual-dsthost kind=cake name=“DOWN” RTT=1
VLAN QUEUE | SIMPLE QUEUE (FastTrack disabled) | FQ-CODEL | GUEST → WAN | 50M | 3,1% CPU queue
/queue type add fq-codel-limit=1024 fq-codel-quantum=300 kind=fq-codel name=fq-codel
/queue simple add dst=“WAN” max-limit=10M/50M name=“VLAN to WAN” queue=fq-codel/fq-codeltarget=VLAN total-queue=fq-codel
INTERFACE QUEUE | CAKE | WiFi | 50M | 2,5% CPU queue (ingress only)
- FQ-CODEL is be the best choice for VLAN traffic shape?
- Is FQ-CODEL a good choice to use in every interface queue like change sfq for wireless and only-hardware-queue for etherX?