I setup two queues for the same network, the 1st one has lower limits and I selected work-days and work-houres. The second rule is intended to have higher limits on all hours not covered by the 1st rule.
What happens, is that in days and times selected by the 1st rule, the trafic does not goes thru any of the 2 ruels
I tryed to change type to ‘default’, but still same problem. What realy chenge by using ‘default’ or ‘default-small’ type ? From linux queues I expected to use ‘sfq’ and not fifo to better distribut avaiable bandwidth. Why does the default is fifo ?
In fact, what I would be able to do is something like:
HoleTarget-Net(say 200.200.200.0/24) has bandwidth limit of 2M
Client-1 (say 200.200.200.100/30) has limit of 1024k with parent=HoleTarget-Net
Client-2 (say 200.200.200.104/30) has limit of 512k with parent=HoleTarget-Net
Client-3 (say 200.200.200.108/30) has limit of 1024k with parent=HoleTarget-Net
Client-4 (say 200.200.200.112/30) has limit of 640k with parent=HoleTarget-Net
If not all using at same time, the individual clients should get ther maximum speed, but if all are using at same time, they will togheter be limited by the 2M.
I tryed to use the ‘parent’ setting of Advanced-tab, arrange the rules so that Client-X are listed befor the HoleTarget-Net rule, tested with different priorities, but I never get the efect I whant 
I also would like to be able to guarantie good performance for all clients for specific trafic, like Voip. In my example, regardless of the HoleTarget 2M I would like to garantie 64K for each Client-X if they are using Voip. Something like a diferent parent / lower priority if its VoIP.
I tryed to figuer oute if the correct setting for the result I whant should be the ‘Queue-Tree’ but I couldn’t get a clear idea.
Any help or implementation ideas are wellcome 
Thanks,
Alexander