Hi there,
have some questions about throughput in that situation:
i wanna use in my base stations Motherboards like:
Intel DN2800MT
Intel D525MW
etc.
with R52Hn.
So the question is, can i get more than 300/300mbit/s (up/down) throughput?
And what would you recommend in this case, for better results.
ty,
best regards,
Mike.
Guys, can some1 help me?
300/300 is data rate not actual throughput
NV2 is not supported on x86 (earlier ver. of 5.x) don’t know about 6.x ver. but if it works mikrotik does not guarantee how well it will perform on x86 (so dont spend ur money on x86)
for best performance I suggest u to use RB800 or something similar instead of x86.
if u want more throughput u can read about advanced channels which are implemented in ros 6.x (mikrotik wiki)
u can do something in best super 
case 150-200mbit and thats all
if u need more next step bonding but I have never tried with N-links I really dont know how it will perform.
Hi, Bonding on N links is perfect , but for best performance you should get same throughput on each link , then bonding will increase your bandwidth
You can use advenced channels feature with AR92xx cards, or, you can use 3x3 cards.
Atom boards works very good with throughput 200-400Mbps
Have u tryed 200-400mbits
2x2 or 3x3?
Is it UDP test?
I have RB800 2x2RCard, 600m, advanced channels, nstreme, TCP>160mbits
Nstreme? for what?
For each client ull use Nstreme? 
I said its base station, will be placed on 60Meters Tube. 
I need more examples, recommendations.
Sorry s1wny I misunderstood u, I was thinking u are talking about p2p link
I dont have experience on p2mp with advanced channel
I have sectors that give >40Mbit real Internet traffic with 40Mhz channel
Give me ur configuration pls, motherboard? rb?
etc
thx.
433AH or 411AH R52Hn or Dbii F50 for sectors
no special wlan configuration just enable nv2
So if ill put one RB800 for each sector, can i have, 20 clients per 1 sector?
U dont have to use RB800 - except if u use lot of firewall, routing and etc (we dont use noting just all interfaces are in bridge) 433AH or 411AH are just fine
now depend of QOS how much bandwidth u want to give per client but this number 20+ clients is ok
We give up to 15mbit per client we have 20-30 clients per sector we have no complaints from clients
This is dally graph from sector with 27 clients
But remember this we dont guarantee (no one can) 15mbit of bandwidth we give up to 15mbits (unlimited traffic) so in different time of day depend of the load of sector clients may get 8-15 mbit.. tested from speedtest, with torrents they can get max speed
I sow sector that give 45-50mbits (normally it was about 4-5 clients using torrents), but for that everything have to be perfect good channel, good signals to all and from all clients -55 up to -65, every client must have LOS, in our practice distance from client to sector is not above 600 max 800m and etc…
And thats not all if u have lets say 2 or 3 sectors per tower for that capacity u cant feed ur tower with main wireless link, for good QOS u need something like fiber to that tower or wireless link with good capacity and low latency and etc
So at the end it all depend what kind of QOS u want to give.
Ok, i understand this fact “bridge”, but i have a bandwidth 1Gbit/s, for nice price.
i wanna give for each client 50+mbit/s, so i want this solution
how i can do this?
I know some WISP do this: 1 rocket M5 = 10 clients (client packets from 50mbits, till 100mbits).
Yes i understand this, that if all 10 clients will use their 100mbit/s for full bandwidth, another client cant get hes 100mbit/s, it will be lower. etc.
I want to get max performance on this sectors, so thats why i started this topic here
I want to ask:
RB800 + http://routerboard.com/R5SHPn (for each chain) or somehow else?, how will be this solution?
R5SHPn is single chain radio
Dbii F50 or R52Hn
Why all chose this Dbii F50 ?