RB 411AH wireless TCP performance

Ibersystems · July 6, 2009, 10:45am

Hi,

I think that with 3.25 performance is going better? It’s possible?

I leave the 411AH at 680, not 800Mhz.. conntrack connected.

Thanks,

InoX · July 6, 2009, 11:30am

no configuration, no help.
good day

Ibersystems · July 6, 2009, 11:40am

haha,

no help needed.

It’s only to say that I have 3.25 intalled now and I arrive this 38 Mbps full duplex in TCP. I think that with 3.13 and others this performance was about 30-33 Mbps in TCP.

Thanks.

InoX · July 6, 2009, 4:27pm

I have 75mbps with 3.24 one way

vspace · July 6, 2009, 4:33pm

what are yours hardware config and wireless settings?
seems like a/g in 40mhz channel… but it’s only my suggestion

Ibersystems · July 6, 2009, 4:54pm

Inox, 75Mbps in TCP?

Vspace, is 5ghz turbo (40MHz) and nstreme.

InoX · July 6, 2009, 11:34pm

yep

Ibersystems · July 7, 2009, 8:25am

I never see such TCP speed at any RB : /

InoX · July 7, 2009, 9:48am

it is between an RB433 and a x86

Muqatil · July 7, 2009, 12:37pm

And with 3.25 you are using 20 connections instead of 1..
It makes the BTest more reliable with higher throughput than only 1 connection…

InoX · July 7, 2009, 10:59pm

this is no btest, is real trafic from 130 users

Muqatil · July 8, 2009, 7:30am

It was refered to Ibersystems’ post

InoX · July 8, 2009, 9:50am

anyway I don’t see the advantages of .n. Everyone is testing with UDP and they get 200mbps but in TCP I see about 80-90mbps. This is not a major improvement…bonding is beter, not cheaper but better.

kabelfrei · July 8, 2009, 9:22pm

hello InoX,

impressive performance. Could you post you config (hardware (cm9?, Antenna?) and RouterOS)

thx,

kabelfrei

InoX · July 14, 2009, 9:44am

offset antenna 80cm, -50 signal, CCQ100%, noise -100, SNR 50dB, 3.24.