Alright, so here is what I did…
When I tried to make ether5 slave to ether1 the router said that only one port could be master on the switch.
So i had to make it so all the other interfaces were no longer slave to ether2.
Then it allowed me to slave ether5 to ether1.
But now the DHCP server is only running on ether2.
Do I now have to run separate DHCP servers on all the non slaved interfaces? Or should I have done this another way?
I thought that ether1 was not on the switch by default?
Thanks again for all your help!
I suggest you create a bridge and put port 2/3/4 into that bridge.
Move all the ether2 related config (IP address, DHCP server, firewall rules) to the bridge and your good to go.
Other possibility is to create a bridge and put port 1 and 5 in that bridge as WAN bridge and return the master-port setting for 3/4 to be slave of ether2
I like the idea of creating a bridge and putting port 1 and 5 in a bridge, that is what my initial instinct was to try and get this working. When I put ports 1 and 5 in a bridge it breaks WAN access from internal network (ports 2,3,4). I think that I need to set up the routing rules to get this to work.
Here is my current routing rules…
i wasn’t aware that this switchchip only can handle one master. i would work with vlans then. bridges also work but as the traffic pass the cpu the performance is not as good as just using vlans