does anybody knows if ports can be grouped on RB2011 to act like a simple switch ? The goal is to achieve wire speed switching on some ports. If it’s possible which ports can be joined to a switch?
Atheros8327 is present on RB2011 series(ether1-ether5+sfp1) RB750GL, RB751G-2HnD and RB1100AH, RB1100AHx2(ether1-ether5, ether6-ether10).
Atheros8227 is present on RB2011 series(ether6-ether10).
More info http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Switch_Chip_Features
There is still one question What’s the difference in features between 8327 and 8227?
Ether6 is master for 7-10. And Ether 2-5, ether6 and wlan 1 are part of bridge-local. Is this correct? And I assume ether 1 is left out because it is the “WAN” port and must be routed?
Ether6 is master for 7-10. And Ether 2-5, ether6 and wlan 1 are part of bridge-local. Is this correct? And I assume ether 1 is left out because it is the “WAN” port and must be routed?[/quote]
The configuration I listed was only to use the RB2011 as a complete switch. Do you have a RB2011UAS-2HnD? If so, add a Cisco compatible GLC module to the SFP port. That will give you GigE ethernet which you can use for you NAT interface to the internet.
The configuration I listed was only to use the RB2011 as a complete switch. Do you have a RB2011UAS-2HnD? If so, add a Cisco compatible GLC module to the SFP port. That will give you GigE ethernet which you can use for you NAT interface to the internet.[/quote]
Yes, I have a RB2011UAS-2HnD. So is my config correct?
I have been searching high and low for a Copper SFP, but they are all in excess of 70 USD. Anyplace where I can source them for cheap?
Do you really need it? 10 copper ports is not enough for you?
Back to the original question. If you need WAN port to be 1G port then do the following:
Set master port for ports 1, 2 and 6 to none.
Set master port for ports 3-5 to ether2.
Set master port for ports 7-10 to ether6.
Make ether2 and ether6 a part of the bridge (bridge-local).
This way you will have ether1 as your WAN port and bridge-local as your LAN port. 1G ports 2-5 are hardware-switched together, 100M ports 6-10 are hardware switched together as well, and these to groups of hardware switched ports are software bridged.
And if 100M is enough for your WAN port you can consider the following scenario as an alternative:
Set master port for ports 1, 6 and 10 to none.
Set master port for ports 2-5 to ether1.
Set master port for ports 7-9 to ether6.
Make ether1 and ether6 a part of the bridge (bridge-local).
This way you will have ether10 as your WAN port and bridge-local as your LAN port. 1G ports 1-5 are hardware-switched together, 100M ports 6-9 are hardware switched together as well, and these to groups of hardware switched ports are software bridged.
Is this config correct? Why is there no entry under “Switch all ports” Does it mean the CPU is handling the traffic now? How do I configure ether1 as the WAN port?
[admin@MikroTik] > interface ethernet switch print
Flags: I - invalid
NAME TYPE MIRROR-SOURCE MIRROR-TARGET SWITCH-ALL-PORTS
That depends on what traffic you’re referring to. Lets assume you’ve configured your device like this:
Set master port for ports 1, 2 and 6 to none.
Set master port for ports 3-5 to ether2.
Set master port for ports 7-10 to ether6.
Make ether2 and ether6 a part of the bridge (bridge-local).
In this case you have two groups of ports. The first group includes 1G ports from 2 to 5, while the second group includes 100M ports from 6 to 10. any traffic passing between any couple of ports inside any given group is handled by the switch chip. But any traffic passing from port in one group to a port in another group will be handled by CPU.
For example:
Traffic between ports 2 and 5 - switch chip
Traffic between ports 3 and 4 - switch chip
Traffic between ports 6 and 7 - switch chip
Traffic between ports 8 and 10 - switch chip
Traffic between ports 3 and 6 - CPU
Traffic between ports 5 and 9 - CPU
There is no way to pass traffic between 1G and 100M ports off-CPU.