Just linked up two sites with 5.5km distances between two of them.
Site A using RB333 with R52H
Site B using RB112 with NMP8602
Throughput test:
RB333-R52H only able to get 13.8Mbps
RB112-NMP8602 able to get 15.1Mbps
Consider the RB333 with R52H is higher spec than RB112-NMP8602, it supposed to be higher output than RB112-NMP8602.
But here are the capture i made:
and
The winner is
Someone, please analyze this. RB333 with R52H should performed much better.
Its the RouterBoard or the miniPCI of R52H cause it ?
The problem is within the RB112. Look at itās CPU occupation: itās always at 100%, so RB333 canāt push more than 13Mbps on the other side (RB112), becouse the āother sideā is at itās limit. Try RB333+R52H with another RB333+R52H with the same distance/connector/antennas, and you will see higher throughput.
The strange thing is the CPU utilization on RB333: 56% is quite high@13Mbps, i expect max 20-25% of utilization IMHO.
Thanks, Iāll try to test RB333-R52 for both side this afternoon.
But iām still curious, because the test i did @ RB112 side only.
Tested by doing sending and receive.
CPU utilize @ RB112 always reach 100% all the time i did the test, i think it will be to hard to send packets to RB333 as much as 15.1Mbps right ?
Mainly the sending part of bandwidth-test is the thing that consumes a lot of CPU power. So the poor little RB112 is more than at itās limit with creating (!) that much traffic. The better test always is to run bandwidth test from high power machines (2 GHz CPU upwards) behind the routers creating the wireless linkā¦
Which is the amount of CCQ and bitrate during your test?
Can you made the test without using the bandwidth server onboard but two pc directly connected to the RB333?
