I intend to rewire my whole network at home and therefore will replace my small 750 router with the RB4011iGS+RM model as it has a SFP+ port…
Now my simple questions (o;
The diagram shows 3 switch block connected to CPU, so it is best to just hook up eth1 as WAN port to the provider and use eth6 - eth10 as LAN ports, though total capacity is limited to 2.5GBits/sec…
Is the SFP+ port meant to be a WAN port as well or can it be used as a LAN port in the same switching domain as eth6 - eth10? I would need this SFP+ connection to a 10GB capable Mikrotik switch in the next room…
Or is it best to just use eth1 as WAN and SFP+ as the only LAN port to a CRS309-1G-8S+IN switch? I assume I can use my old Cisco SFP-T modules for supplying 1000baseT.
Wish there was Mikrotik router with just few SFP(+) ports as I always use fibre cable between rooms and floors (o;
If you are not using any advanced switch-features (VLAN etc.) then the group will be switched at full speed without passing the CPU. No port is meant for WAN, it’s up to you to decide.
You could group the clients on the two switch-groups in such a way that you minimize the need for passing between the CPU. (in terms of bandwidth heavy)
I think the primary reason for the SFP+ is to connect to an SFP+ 10G switch or NAS/Server. Cisco SFP-T will probably work great, alltrough I have no experience with RB4011.
You can use the SFP+ port in the same bridge as the rest of the ports. That will work; I run my 4011 (the one with WiFi) that way, with all interfaces in a single bridge (I actually bought it as a 10G-capable wireless AP and don’t use the gig ports at all).
Just keep in mind that, as you already noticed, the two switch chips (ethernet 1-5 & 6-10) only have a 2.5Gbps connection off-chip, so spreading your 1000BASE-T hosts over the two chips may take some planning, if you have a lot of local (host-to-host) traffic.
Yes, it is. You can connect the NAS to the SFP+ port with your SFPs, and you won’t use any internal bandwidth between the switch chips that way, as it has its own connection to the CPU.
Well I just ordered now the CRS309-1G-8S+IN switch…which will do the distribution in the house…and currently use my hEX RB750GR3 as a router…
One of my Linux stations will get a 10GB card as well, and maybe a Mac machine, just in case I do network rendering with Octane… so the RB4011iGS+RM alone won’t be enough…
In a second step some small switches need replacement, those old D-Link and TP-Link switches with no or old management (o;
Well..depends on the SwitchOS experience first (o;
There is no 3rd party SFP(+) compatibility list for Mikrotik products?
But basically all routers/switches with SFP+ can accept SFP+ I conclude…
Will keep you posted on how it goes with 3rd party SFP and SFP+ modules…
I’ve used various SFP+ modules on RB4011 without any issues.
CISCO-AVAGO 10Gbase-SR SFBR-709SMZ-CS2
CISCO-AVAGO 10Gbase-LR SFCT-739SMZ
FS 10GBase-ER SFP-10GER-31
OPTIC 10Gbase-SR S+85DLC03D
MikroTik 10Gbase-SR S+85DLC03D
And a few more (mainly 1Gbit) that I don’t recall at the moment.
As a matter of fact, I’ve used all of the above on MikroTik (CCR & RB4011) and also Cisco devices (Nexus 7700, C2960XR, C3850, etc) without any problems (except for the Nexus which by default it complains about non genuine cisco SFP modules, and you need to run “service unsupported-transceiver” for them to start working).