RB4011iGS wifi vs non-wifi version

So I wanted to get one of the RB4011iGS’s, but.. due to global shortage of electronics supply, it’s hardly available and the only one I see available now is the wifi version.
I don’t need the wifi and I generally prefer having “less-featured” versions of hardware as there are less things that can break.

Perhaps someone has some bad experience, having issues with wifi version (but non-wifi related) which did not occur on the non-wifi one(s)?

I have the wifi version.
I had the same hesitations at first, especially when I decide to rackmount the device. But the wifi has proven useful.
I use it to tether to a phone (No USB on the RB4011) for WAN failover.

I have clicked on the Tik router wifi on occasion to get a wifi scan.

be aware RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN is hotter than non wifi version

wifi version consumes 5 watt more and that is significant in a passive cooled device like this

operating ambient temperature witness this:

RB4011iGS+RM
Tested ambient temperature -40°C to 70°C

RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN
Tested ambient temperature -40°C to 45°C

if you have a hot environment will be better to use the non wifi version

if you use a hot 10g sfp module you will need to put active cooling (a fan) or ensure a cool environment, thats exacerbated on wifi version