RB912UAG-5HPnD-OUT throughput?

[mauricioisp]

Hi guys,
I’m considering to replace my Rocket M5s with the RB912UAG-5HPnD-OUT, I’m using 30dBi antenna and I’ve -50dBm signal strength, what would be the expected throughput with the RB912UAG-5HPnD-OUT?

Thanks,

[laithmikrotik]

just use nv2/nsetrem wireless protocol and adjust noise floor threshold to -120/-124 and remember ; you can not use rb912 as a point to roocket m5 , you should use ptp with two mikrotik devices…

[InoX]

At least 170mbps.

[mauricioisp]

Hi inox,
That’s pretty similar to the 160mbps aggregated throughput I can get with 2 rocket m5 in p2p. I was thinking of 200mbps+ performance, such as ligowave pro.

[popcorrin]

@mauricioisp

Hi inox,
That’s pretty similar to the 160mbps aggregated throughput I can get with 2 rocket m5 in p2p. I was thinking of 200mbps+ performance, such as ligowave pro.

Just because the internal speedtest on airos shows 160mbps, that doesn’t mean you can actually get that kind of throughput with a rocket m5.
With real traffic, you would be doing good to get 100mbps of actual throughput.

[mauricioisp]

Why should I adjust noise floor threshold to -120/-124 ?

Thanks,

[laithmikrotik]

@mauricioisp

Why should I adjust noise floor threshold to -120/-124 ?

Thanks,

to get high rx/tx signal strength with rx/tx ccq…i use this method just with ptp …

[n21roadie]

@laithmikrotik

@mauricioisp

Why should I adjust noise floor threshold to -120/-124 ?

Thanks,

to get high rx/tx signal strength with rx/tx ccq…i use this method just with ptp …

Interesting tweak, currently testing on a PTP which was 58/56dBm and 59db SNR, now using -120 noise floor i have 50/52dBm and 68SNR, CCQ appears to much higher from 80% to 100% but as this link is not fully aligned I will wait till it is but a increase in signal and snr it’s most welcome.