Real throughput in R52H

Hi I want to use 40 mhz 5 ghz link. If the distance is 150meter, and I’ll use 25dBi grid. What will be my real throughput?
One side have RB411A or AH
Other side have RB600A(I’ll use 3 sectors for 3 different cards which are 2.4 Ghz+ one for link 5Ghz)
But using RB433AH+RB411A or AH will be cheaper than RB600A anyway. So I will may use that combination too.
Which one will give best performance? and can you write real throughput in both?

OMG 350mW card an 25dBi antena for 150m? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
This is really noobs stuff…

I just wanna push it up as hard as I could do.

Right. It won’t work that way.

You need an R52, no H, I probably won’t complain about the antenna too much, however, I’d drop it to a smaller panel antenna, something like a 18-20dBi. You’ll still have to drop TX power to almost nothing.

But I have bought it, I just wanna know the real throughput.

Where are you located?

Turkey :confused:

More power doesnt mean more mbps. You need to have a -55…-65 signal. And you will have a low transfer rate with that power…under 20mbps I belive. In 2.4 and 5.2 Ghz I have 50mbps stable transfer with -65…-70 signals.

You want to focus on a signal between -64 and -72

to get 50 mbps?
I don’t understand something:
If signal is very nice, this card makes output power lower to get high speeded connection right? So it doesn’t matter I think.

R52 or other low power card and 14 dbi or lower antennas. Your design is like two people standing in the same room shouting as loud as they can. 150m is nothing for two small panels antennas.

And the R52 will be more reliable because there is no amp circuit to go bad.

For PtP links I usually use R52 not R52H for up to 10 to 15km using 2 foot dish antennas (29dBi). Signal is about -65 which is perfect.

I was a noob about 9 years ago so I know what you are going through. In this case, less is more.

Tom