After spending some time familiarizing myself with RouterOS using a combination of Webfig and SSH (because I don’t want to install Rosetta on my Apple Silicon machine) I get the idea that Webfig is a second class citizen behind WinBox, which I can live with. But there are a couple things I’ve run across that seem like outright mistakes. Is there somewhere I can make a bug report? I see a 2+ year old post about reporting bugs in the v7 Beta to support @ mikrotik . com — is that still valid?
FWIW here’s the example leading me to ask the question : I’ve set up a couple VETH devices for containers using Webfig. Via ssh I can “/interface/veth print” and get all the expected information. (name, address, gateway, etc.) But in Webfig the address is not shown in the appropriate field as I would expect. Everything else is there. If this is not a bug, how am I supposed to ever know which address was assigned to a VETH within Webfig?
Haha, of course that is now obvious and I’m almost embarrassed for asking. (except I was also hoping someone would give me a reason for the behavior I’m observing) For sure I saw that page once before I bookmarked the next page … https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/
It is a bug for sure. Same with “Winbox”
On CLI, when doing a “print” of the vETH you get so see the IP address
On Winbox, it is 0.0.0.0 for every vETH
It was on 7.10 and now on 7.11 also.
Thanks for the replies! Belated update : I submitted the VETH behavior as a bug and got confirmation it’s considered a problem, also that it’s being fixed … with an indeterminate release. But that’s fine by me, it’s definitely not a critical issue. Sell no wine before its time, and I’d rather have everything correct than have anything soon.
But that’s fine by me, it’s definitely not a critical issue. Sell no wine before its time, and I’d rather have everything correct than have anything soon.