ROS SXT and ubnt In contrast to delay

[huigezi]

ROS delay than the UBNT gap is too big

[hossein]

it is because of different parameters that cmd uses for ping and what mikrotik does.

[huigezi]

@hossein

it is because of different parameters that cmd uses for ping and what mikrotik does.

I want to say

use nv2 of mikrotik is get high delay

and use ubnt it'is not this ping delay

[taduikis]

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it’s sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

[n21roadie]

@taduikis

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it’s sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

I often wonder is the higher ping times on NV2 due to all the stuff the Mikrotik has on each device even after removing unneeded packages, could it be a processor issue and is there lower ping times with a faster processor?

[InoX]

@taduikis

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it’s sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

no tdma for ubnt in that picture

[linek1980]

tdma UBI

[0ldman]

@InoX

@taduikis

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it’s sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

no tdma for ubnt in that picture

Agreed.

It isn’t a valid comparison to use TDMA on one and not the other.

[InoX]

@linek1980

tdma UBI

airmax is disabled, so no tdma

[Polky]

I would prefer to test the functionality. NV2 is useless in most cases. UBNT beat MK, both in response and in functionality.

[taduikis]

Yeah. And that is sad. It seems that they need so little to make their already great product just perfect..

[n21roadie]

@Polky

I would prefer to test the functionality. NV2 is useless in most cases. UBNT beat MK, both in response and in functionality.

I find NV2 very good it will be better when latency is reduced and is far for useless.