yes any 802.11G, 2.4Ghgz or 5Ghz, ie:
N device to connecto to an AP with 802.11G (40Mhz or g-turbo)
I prefer using 32dBi antennas (solid dish or 80cm satellite dish + 5GHz feeder) and use lower tx power.
Also i have seen more stable results with best fit and 3200.
thanks for advice 
I will try..
groove is 802.11n device, it does not support turbo modes (40MHz channel) for 802.11a and 802.g modes.
What you can do on AP is select 5ghz-a/n mode and then choose 20/40MHz channel width. As result clients will connect using 802.11a to 20 MHz channel and other client will be able to connect using 5GHz 802.11n and use 40MHz HT channel.
turbo mode is not the same as 40MHz HT channel.
also, why not to use 802.11n? more data at same channel width.
because, there are currently many sites that already on turbo mode and all of their clients are turbo enabled (not supporting 802.11n).
hmm seems like we to have to stick with Rb411 and R52/R52H …
and hoping they are not discontinued very soon.
yeah, after align antenna I have -53/-53 ccq + - 100%..
BT test groove-groove 97mbps Receive / 97mbps send…of coutre Nstreme best fit 3999 .
Now I have a question, can groove generate more data? over 97mbps? because it stops on 97mbps…ccq is still 100%, ping 1-10ms where is the problem? 
You should run a throughput test between 2 units that are connected to each end of your groove-groove link. This way the CPU of these external units produce the data and the groove’s only have to pass the traffic. Now you can really ‘see’ how much your link can carry.
Probably you run into 100% cpu capacity if you have the groove also produce the data stream…
propably you are right…
nice, have you tried tcp?
mine never hit any greater than 75mbps in tcp(one way), UDP has been 97-98mbps.
using nv2, ccq 100%, ping varies from 2-15 (nv2 characteristic), Signal -54/-58.
btw there’s no point chasing after something over 100mbps, cos its ether only works on 100Mbps (upto) 
You only have 100M FD connection don’t you? 
I dont have got enough HW to do TCP test. Behind groove there is only UBNT M5 sector. But now groove works perfectly. Primary the groove L3 is cheaper than ubnt bullet M5 HP and result is same.
are groove and Ubiquiti bullet 5m compatible with each other?
Does the mimo technology yet?
Propably in 802.11a …I think thats not a good idea…
I found this site, the groove can not communicate with the bullet 5M.
I will regret if I want to gradually switch to the groove.
A wonderful device.
http://www.wirelessinfo.be/Link-testen/bgc-farman_30102011Eng/index.htm
It can, you only have to set both as legacy 802.11a device. Ubnt airmax or MT-NV2 is both propietary TDMA which means in that mode they cannot.
But in legacy they have to comply with the IEEE 802.11a standard and thus they can…
If i use groove for point to point 10km which antenna is suitable Omni Or Grid . And how much dbi antenna wanted
Grid of course