Hi all,
We use an in-house App for provisioning CPEs, currently the hAP Lite model (RB941-2nD-TC). The App first identifies the device it’s connecting to, to make sure we don’t try to provision say an RB951 with the config parameters for the hAP Lite.
We have found a discrepancy in what is returned by /system routerboard print for EXACTLY the same device model, hardware appearance, etc.
In one case, it returns:
[admin@661806F7260F] > /system routerboard print
routerboard: yes
board-name: hAP lite
model: RouterBOARD 941-2nD
serial-number: 661806F7260F
firmware-type: qca9531L
factory-firmware: 3.33
current-firmware: 3.33
upgrade-firmware: 6.43.7
In another, it returns:
[admin@9D76095754E9] > /system routerboard print
routerboard: yes
board-name: hAP lite
model: RB941-2nD
serial-number: 9D76095754E9
firmware-type: qca9531L
factory-firmware: 6.42.1
current-firmware: 6.43.5
upgrade-firmware: 6.43.7
Is there a reason for this? We can account for it but we want to know if we have to expect random naming (and I have read the “how do we name stuff” thread and Wiki entry!)