A popular question on the forum recently has been the performance testing procedure of RouterBOARD devices. Some people expressed interest in repeating the tests, or doing the same tests with some additional configuration. We have written a new article specifically for this reason, by using the RB1100AHx2 as an example:
Great article, I agree. Thank you for the clear explanation on how to replicate your results. Traffic generator seems like another ROS tool that puts Mikrotik above the rest. …I just don’t see the point to fastpath if firewall and conn track have to be off. Can anyone explain in what situations it would be useful?
Would Equal Cost Multipath still work with fastpath? If so I could use it to distribute traffic to multiple firewall/mangle boxes for higher throughput.
I hope that’s not the procedure you use to report your “rfc2544 thoughput numbers”. There’s a reason for the rfc, so that we all use the same test procedure.
no, this is only for users who want to test their routers and do some number crunching. RFC test is done one professional testing equipment other way, as you say - there would not be any reason to run them if they are not comparable.
I am new to this forum and I would like to ask a question regarding these tests, in case one of you guys knows something.
I am looking at the routerboard metal 5SHPN specifications, that are provided in this webpage: http://routerboard.com/RBMetal5SHPn, and in the performance test results they are mentioning Gbit port.
However, the specs say that the device only has one FE port.
How can they perform a test on a Gb port, with achieved BW of 997.9M (packet size 1518), when the device’s port is a FE one?
for example the SXT devices already come pre-configured for CPE usage. All you need to do, is open 192.168.88.1 from the ethernet cable side, and enter the SSID name of the wireless AP.