RouterOS v5 beta4 released

What’s new in 5.0beta4 (2010-Jun-29 15:48):

*) console - /ping command again returns number of ping responses received,
didn’t work in 5.0beta3;
*) added ability to monitor each cpu core usage;
*) added support for SATA,SCSI & USB CD-ROMs in CD installer;
*) fixed problem - IRQ balancer did not use correct CPU core
on non auto MSI irqs after reboot;
*) fixed memory leak;
*) route - new property ‘vrf-interface’ (for static and dhcp routes),
automatically updates ‘routing-mark’ of the route to keep it in the same
VRF as the specified interface;

Torrent: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/routeros-ALL-5.0beta4.torrent
HTTP download: http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html

snmp voltage still broken… :frowning:

Thank you very much :smiley:

Thanks - boosted my 4core core routers throughput 2.5x, by manually assign interfaces to cores
And now with “/system resources cpu” menu, “/system resources irq” menu makes much more sense.

I also noticed that number of interrupts goes to 0 as soon as interface reaches some certain speed.
It looks like Linux Kernel enable NAPI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_API. So on high speed routers i suggest to assign IRQs manually

Hi, Just some feedback

We have a Dell R610 with SAS, but unfortunatly RouterOs doesnt have drivers for this server as yet.
We can work around using flash memory as the hard drive.

Thanks

HI all
works 100% on my new quad core router with 10eth running.
Nice with the cpu and irq meny thanks MikroTik

Upgraded about 30 RB450g/RB433AH/RB493AH and my RB1000 to b4 today. So far, memory leak seems to be plugged.

Opening up an IPv6 route closes my WinBox. This was on a clean install, rb750. I can add/edit routes using terminal just fine.

Memory leak looks fixed so far. I noticed weirdness where an aborted PPTP client session would not delete the IP address and then it couldn’t reconnect because the old address was still there.

Making good progress though! :slight_smile: I will be very happy to see more services available via IPv6.

Thats been there for a long time with any PPP connection, even on PPPOE from time to time.

I run this script every minute to combat it.

/ip address remove [/ip address find where invalid]

Boot hard drive slow boot about 1 minute and 20 seconds after the card to Newsletter
Also went on the Intel Gigabit NIC do not know whether the drive to improve. .
Before 4.x-5.x has been packet loss network communication failure I can not modify the network card auto-negotiation state or disabled may be able to return to work after the opening of hope to solve

01:58:05 system,info router rebooted
01:59:24 system,info,account user admin logged in via winbox
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈.jpg

on x86 wireless wan por,t winbox disconect … no more then 60 second conection … on ethernet all ok , that was also an isue on beta 3 …

all ok on x86 but tourch dont chow port just dst and src address

So far working good on RB450G with User Manager and RB750 in bridge mode. Thanks MikroTik Guys for the better WinBox ! Keep up the good work :slight_smile:

no issues here yet on my 433uah, too afraid to try it on my 450’s after the last beta…
will see how it goes.

are you using a pc as a router if so
which pci cards are you using in the computer and how many wireless cards are on it
i am trying to work out if 1 pci slot has enough power for 4 R52hn cards
thanks

Got about 50 400 series units upgraded and running SSTP to my RB1000 on 5.0b4. So far so good. For my purposes at least.

I’m using a x86 berabone 1U router HW that are having 10 ethernet direct on the motherboard.

Has anyone tested N in 10mhz and 5mhz channel sizes? I am interested in deploying it in a PTMP AP scenario.

110 SSTP connections to a RB1000 on 5.0b4 w/ client/server certificate verification, 5 connections local, CHAP authentication, 105 connections RADIUS CHAP authentication, 2048 bit certs w/ the following remote HW:

2x RB433
9x RB433AH
91x RB450G
8x RB493AH

30ish running hotspot, 106 running w/ non-caching proxy.

So far, so good. Disabled OpenVPN now. Hoping to NOT have random crashes on the 1000 that I was having before.

Still looking to find out what level/cipher of encryption SSTP uses. Anyone?

Then I Try to make ssh from router (5B4) - I see next “debug” :

client version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.3p2 Debian-9etch2
transport state: 0 → 1
kex algo: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-he
llman-group1-sha1
host key algo: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
enc algo CS: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,ar
cfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes2
56-ctr
enc algo SC: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,ar
cfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes2
56-ctr
mac algo CS: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha
1-96,hmac-md5-96
mac algo SC: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha
1-96,hmac-md5-96
comp algo CS: none,zlib@openssh.com
comp algo SC: none,zlib@openssh.com
lang CS:
lang SC:
packet follows: 0
agreed on: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1
agreed on: aes192-cbc
agreed on: aes192-cbc
agreed on: hmac-sha1
agreed on: hmac-sha1
agreed on: none
agreed on: none
died with signal 11 on Tue Jul 6 09:29:08 2010

With ROS 4.10 - all OK.

Any Ideas?