Simple queues: a very anomaly

RouterOS General
1

hi, i have this anomaly

I have setting a simple queues for the all user in my MT,
i have setting the queues in this mode:
I use Winbox
in the windows general:
Name: User1
Target Address: 1.1.1.1 (the user ip, i assigned whit pppoe connection)
Targhet Upload/download: 256k

in the windows advanced:
P2P:allp2p
Interface: All
Targhet Upload/download: 64k

all the other options, are default

This system function ok, but for one user if i setting any option in the advanced windows, this queue not work for this user…Example

User whit problem

in the windows general:
Name: User2
Target Address: 1.1.1.2 (the user ip, i assigned whit pppoe connection)
Targhet Upload/download: 256k

in the windows advanced:

all the other options, are default

all ok, if i use this configuration, i have a problem

in the windows general:
Name: User2
Target Address: 1.1.1.2 (the user ip, i assigned whit pppoe connection)
Targhet Upload/download: 256k

in the windows advanced:
P2P:allp2p
Interface: All
Targhet Upload/download: 64k

but enough that I setting only one option in the advance windows, end this queue not working…

what is??

Sorry for my english
Thanks

2

you are configureing one queue and if you set p2p option, then only p2p traffic is beeing shaped.

to contorl p2p and other trafic then you hate to set 2 queues one normal and one for p2p

and you can set in ppp what speed this connection is going to support.

3

yes janisk, now it is all ok

i I did not know, I thought was alone one queue for normal end p2p, I have made as you have said end the system work ok

Thanks

4

that mean’s, I must conf. for one IP, two queues… ?
One for (example) http, mail and so on…
And oher to p2p ?

5

You could configure a P2P rule to shape all P2P share one chunk of bandwidth for it equally across all IPs, for example if you set this limit to 512k and 4 users are pumping P2P, they get 128k each, HOWEVER if one of those users is only allowed 64k in another queue they cant exceed their total allowed while doing this, BUT the extra bandwidth (64k in this example) is not used, which from an ISP standpoint is not a bad thing. Anyone agree/disagree with this?

I just learned about it in advance mikrotik training and havent implemented it yet, but was told I could.