SOHO Router for Gbit PPPoE ISP

Hello community,

Recently I switched to new ISP with Gbit plan over PPPoE and seems my current RB951G-2HnD can’t handle that, so I’m thinking about upgrade, but I not sure which SOHO RouterBoard is best suitable for WAN Gbit PPPoE.

Here are new SOHO stars: hEX and hAP ac routers, but I’m not sure are they suitable for me. I read blog reviews and some of them were saying “hAP ac has less powerful CPU than hEX”. Performance tables on routerboard.com showing that hAP outperforms hEX, so I’m a bit confused with this.

So the question is: will hEX or hAP handle my loads or I need to find other solution? Wireless cards in router are optional for me, I’ll use the router mainly for wired connections.

Thanks!

I thing RB951G is enough.

Try enabled fasttrack with PPPoE

Upgrade to 6.35rc37 or above and enable fasttrack
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Fast_Path

In 6.35rc is suported fastpath for PPPoE
What´s new i 6.35rc:
*) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support;

It is like the RB2011. It should not be enough.

I have that at 65% with 500Mbps download and fasttrack. And without PPPoE.

Gx2 ← (not sure about PPPoE). And assuming asymmetric.

rb2011 download about 900Mbit with fasttrack
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack#FastTrack_on_RB2011

RB951G - maybe more then 300Mbit with PPPoE and fasttrack. Maybe this test is limited by ISP speed:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/radius-server-not-working-in-2-8-11/127/1

There are hardly any rules in that RB2011 example.

And what is the packet size?

Time to update firmware. Thanks for the hint. I’ll be back with results.

BTW, why hAP ac and hEX performance tables so different? As I understood QCA9558 and QCA9556 share same CPU architecture, but QCA9558 has wireless in SoC. Or I missed something?

Here is table with SoC comparisons. Still unclear what causes higher performance in hAP ac over hEX.

I’m curious. Please share your result :slight_smile:

Maybe they were tested with different RouterOS versions. Someone asked once why hEX was faster.