Some R&D

RouterOS Wireless Networking
1

I have the following:
433ah with XR2 -3 nos.
XYZ make 120 degree sectors - 3 nos.

All 3 I run my cards on 2.4 B mode to have a decent CCQ. approx. 90-100. Changing the cards to 2.4 G or b/g takes down the CCQ to 25-35.

I got my new set of following items:
433ah with R52Hn - 3 nos.
Airmax 120 degree sectors - 3 nos.

Will it be better or worse if I still run my cards on 2.4 B. I mean I must be wasting the “n” feature of the card if I run it in “b” mode.

The Airmax sectors I have heard r awesome and I want to know what is the best way to deploy.

2

If u running in b mode than there is no point it should be the same, Airmax sectors are dual polarization so to use this feature u need to run N

3

WILL changing to 2.4 b/g/n affect the CCQ. AND do i have to keep the same CPE or change it to “n” supporting cpe’s

4

bgn.JPG
this is R52Hn with Airmax antenna I change band for 2 min from b/g/n to only b
but I cant guarantee that u get the same results it depend what client equipment u have, noise floor etc etc

5

Also dude XR2 600mW
why do u need so much power??

6

we have a noise floor of 75-90. lot of buildings around. lot of interfering AP’s. we had a compex card b4 but the latency wld go high on client site very frequently so replaced them with XR2.

what client equipments r u using? we have all tplink 501 cpe’s till now.

7

Loco M on 2.4,Rb411+R52 on 5.2 now we started to use SXT.

8

411 + R52 or R52n . since to use the MIMO clients should better be MIMO

9

433ah + r52Hn + 120 deg Airmax Sector running 2 GHz “b/g/n” none of my clients connect. It was working good with 433ah + xr2 +120deg Sector.

Do i need different clients CPE for r52Hn cards. Noise floor is -103/105?
Please help