Also, as a side question - does anyone argue that L2 / L3 cache sizes make any bit of difference when running mikrotik? Any reason why a celeron would be any slower running mikrotik than a full p4/d?
I have been using a super micro system for a few months…
I use 3 of them to link three sites together via VPN.
I link 80 people together and to my remote data center and to a colocation center.
Theise sites are spread over the phoenix area.
(Phoenix airport, downtown, tempe (2 locations))
I usa a “apliance” case from supermicro and supermicro boards.
I cant rememberthe board number at the moment, but they are rock solid.
The only thing I dont like is that they use 2.5" drives.
I will update this post in the AM with the board number..
Cache size ALWAYS makes a difference. Cache is however pretty expensive to produce as it runs at the core frequency (L1) or less (L2/L3).
For each lookup missed by the cache you will have a hit for that single instruction that is hundred times the actual time to execute that instruction.
On some architectures you’ll have a penalty closer to a thousand times the instruction execution time.
Just following up on this … never got a straight answer from anyone. Does Mikrotik work with the Intel 82573V? I know SuperMicro works for the most part because I have 3 so far … but I do not see this chip on their supported list. I don’t want to waste a few thousand on superservers that are not compatible with Mikrotik.
I don’t see Intel 82573V (Tekoa) on the list - does anyone have one of these that works? Here is the actual mobo its on:
Is anyone using any PCI-E motherboard with intel nics on it? I guess many of the newer boards are pci-e and are not working with the older intel driver. All new boards are this way and if the mt driver doesn’t support it then there will be many support requests shortly. No one has a pci-e mobo with intel nics? Please : )
Can you tell me which 82XXX that chip is on yours? I’m curious if it works although not listed in the mikrotik supported list. Supposedly the intel driver is unified, but with the pci-e ones I think it is required to use their newer build of the driver. If yours is working and its not on the list I’m going to take a chance and order 2 of them from newegg… but being stuck with $2k worth of boxes would suck : )
I know the PCI-X Intel cards work fine, I am using many of them currently in SuperMicros… but the new PCI-E makes me wonder. I don’t believe the older driver supports these. No one is using PCI-E Intel NICs (onboard)?
I put a DOM in my Dell which has PCI-E and the nic did not work. I didn’t mess with it all, I just popped in a PCI netgear nic and it worked.
The Dell is a Dimension 9150 with a Dual Core PentiumD 3Ghz CPU. The onboard nic was Intel PRO/1000 PL. Not to sure on the details of the nic.
“While in theory PCI Express x16 can offer clearly more performance than PCI-X 533 - 8 GB/s compared to 4.26 GB/s”
“This brings us to what PCI Express as a system expansion interface is really all about: not necessarily being faster than PCI-X, but rather being simpler and offering bandwidth to each device separately. Hence there are more and more professional server/workstation class chipsets that put emphasis on PCI Express, because having bandwidth dedicated to each device is appealing.”
The onboard NICs are all going to PCI-e because of performance. Intel will be shipping their first card for pci-e this month, right now its only the onboard NICs using the new chipset from Intel.