We’re using the DSL routers in bridge mode, etc - so you can imagine all the network cables, power cables and phone cables going to the rack where the DSL routers are (then to the routeros system).
If you could provide an update with this drive included, that would be appreciated (if not already supported).
sure, but are there any intensions on supporting this interface in the near future? Although I’m new posting here, I’ve seen several threads of people who use DSL as their upstream service…
Not to be a pain or anything, but if the linux version of ROS 5.5 uses a similar build to that of the driver of the PCI QUAD adsl port device (if what “jamiewatson69” said was true?), what would be the hold up with allowing this device to function? (essentially, an adsl link is like an ethernet link… to an extent?)
ROS has support for many wireless and ethernet based interfaces. I have only seen this PCI QUAD ADSL (there are probably more though)…
Is it that you would have to create a new menu/module (a bit like the wireless module and interface module) for ADSL? (in that case, if you were going to release a single port onboard ADSL routerboard, it would have that feature)
I’m trying to figure out what the hold up would be, or who to pay (obviously development takes time and human resources) to make this happen? - I personally would REALLY love this feature to be included in an update, considering how much less cabling there would be in our server room (and other issues, such as power packs to ADSL routers dieing. The extra latency… all adds up).
An ADSL interface on a routerboard would actually be nice though - I can see the sales of that being relatively successful. This, bundled into a unit with wireless and 4 ports + an extra ethernet WAN port would make serious competition on the corporate router side of things (I say this with the amount of businesses we do IT support for that have Draytek or CISCO routers).
Very good news. Infact I am waiting for this. I am already an ISP and I want to become a WISP.
I am doing products evalution and I can say that a mikrotik and separate adsl modem is not good because:
if mikrotik locks there is watchdog, but if the adsl modem locks???
two boxes, two power supplies so 4 thing that can break plus cables, etc.
I need to to solar powered installations and two boxes means double power consumption.
So I need to know when you will do this product, I for sure will buy many of them (100/1000, etc.)
Can you at least say if you plan to offer the adsl as a mini pci expansion board? So I can start buying some mikrotik unit knowing that in the future I can use them also as modems.