in my experience with AC, low throughput is the result of not clean frequency channel.
try to scan air and change to free channel. or even better to set to superchannel and go to ~5900
I changed to nv2 and 802.11 and the speed is lower, and either is CCQ.
I switched frequencies during the night and I found a good 80MHz channel in AC. Speed is about 220Mbps both on upload and download, which is very good, using nstreme. Using nv2 or 802.11 I can reach only 95Mbps using nv2 and 150 using 802.11.
Using nstreme I have some “extensive data loss”:
But signal is very good, and CCQ is about 94-99%…
Nstreme is usually causing too many poll timeouts… not extensive data loss IMO. NV2 is the way in place where you dont have more than 1 link in a chain, otherwise you will see low TCP connection throughput (single or multiple connections)
Switched to nstreme from nv2 on some links and from 10Mbps single or 20Mbps multiple TCP connections now getting over 50Mbps with 1 connection. No extensive data loss noticed. Dual chain N links and 40MHz single chain. Did not test on AC.
I don’t argue with you about wireless debug messages. But i a few months ago i tried to optimize wireless networks and played with protocols. With nstreme i got extensive data loss, the same was with plain 802.11N. This wasnt happened with nv2.
It could be that in the p2mp mode tcp throughput is related to protocol, But bigger influence to throughput is clean air or not.
I have to test it.
I will post results here