Just curious if you guys are working on a 2.4Ghz version of the SXT?
I am also very interested to know: Are there any plans to release version to 2.4 GHz?
why do you want to use 2,4 ?
Because it is very good for stations-clients that are connected to a 2.4GHz AP.
In the US a lot if not most operators use 5.8 for tower to tower back-haul links, making it difficult to set up 5.8 for PTMP without interfering with the PTP links on your network.
yes I understand that but the SXT is build for PTP ? ? ? not PTMP
why not PtMP? It can be both a CPE → AP or a Point → Point. It doesn’t matter.
IMO it is much better suited to PTMP CPE device than anything. A level 3 license is generally suited to CPE devices.
we have 5-10Km links with SXT devices running for several months here in Latvia. It’s been cold and wet, some times temperature is -15C, but it works great. We have 200Mbit datarate on those links.
we have 5-10Km p-t-p links with SXT devices running for several months here in Latvia. It’s been cold and wet, some times temperature is -15C, but it works great. We have 200Mbit datarate on those links.
I never really though of it for use in PTP, due to the level three license, for some reason I always though you needed LVL 4 for bridge mode.
no, you don’t need level4 for point to point links.
Well that’s good news, learn something new every day.
200mbps link over a 10/100 Ethernet port?
ever heard of full duplex? 802.11n data rate is locked at 216Mbit for some of our links.
That is half duplex where as the Ethernet port is Full duplex. So 200Mbit half is = to 100Mbit full.
100 one way, 100 another way.
Mode: bridge ?
Im planning to use a solid dish offset like the motorola canopy dish, or like this.
45cm and 60cm Its seems add 10dbi to 45cm dish
Mode: bridge ?
yes, mode “bridge” works with Level3 license, and allows one connected client, making this a P-t-P link.