I thought I am a little bit advanced in configuring RouterOS .. doesn’t seem this way.
This is my issue:
Subnet 10.1.1.0/24 with DHCP server on Port eth2 (Master Port for eth3-eth5) @ Switch group 1
Subnet 192.168.1.0/24 no DHCP server on Port eth9 (no master/slave) @ Switch group 2
I CAN ping + access via telnet my device attached to eth9 (192.168.1.1) from RouterOS
I CANNOT ping or access this device from any other network (e.g. my base network 10.1.1.0/24)
I already tried:
bridging two ports of switch group 1+2 together
defining static routes (although it seems to be done correctly in dynamic/auto mode)
played around with some firewall/nat rules
and all variants of this ..
= none if this worked
What can I try next?
The device itself is a MikroTik RB3011UIAS-RM
The subnet 10.1.1.0/24 is used for general purpose (Internet connectivity), so personal devices like PC or Smartphone via WiFi are connecting to this one.
My use case: I want to configure a new DSL modem (Draytek Vigor 130), which I currently attached to eth9 (later on, this will function as bridged MPoA @ eth1/WAN for the MikroTik router)
The Vigor 130 does come with a factory default static network configuration, the device has the IP address 192.168.1.1, so no - I don’t think the router is set as gateway.
So what I’m trying to achieve is, that I can access the 192.168.1.1 Web interface - connecting to the Vigor 130 does already work from the router itself (e.g. via telnet) - but not from any other device.
I tried to define a static route for the specific network 192.168.1.0/24 on the specific port .. but the DSL modem can’t be reached from any other client - except the directly attached router itself.
Maybe it is a speciality of the Vigor 130 ?!
Since I don’t have to re-configure the device everyday (just using it as a DSL modem / MPoA bridge / PPPoE pass-through), the connectivity isn’t really an issue after the setup (which I did for now).