I dont know if this is the right forum, but here goes anyway…
Has anybody managed to get Cacti graphs to monitor PPPOE interfaces properly?
I have managed to get it to monitor the dynamic interface that is generated on the mikrotik router but my problem comes when that interface changes due to a PPPOE session end. The next time the user logs in they will get a different dynamic interface.
Has anyone managed this before? Is anyone willing to share / help me through this?
Chupaca, Im trying as you suggested to create a pppoe server for each user.
Will this generate more/less/equal CPU usage?
Now I see that the interface does not appear in simple queue list, but still gets limit. Does it make any difference at all? Where the limit is taking place if not in the queue?
I have a 80% CPU usage at a RB1200. I am trying to find out how using 300 PPPOE servers will impact in the hardware.
Thank you very much for the idea, I just needed the graphs of usage and with this is possible.
If you are using Simple Queue for shaping users traffic with PPPoE - then you can graph based on Simple queue - its easy and name is always the same: - I found it easy to get this values with SNMP and make graphs. I dont use cacti but I use the same way cacti get values - so it should be doable.
hey bro cdman…
my pppoe secrets create dynamic queue cause their profile assigned bandwidth by rate limit. So every time if customer reconnect they get a different name oid, bytes-in oid etc. so how i configure dynamic queue for graphing.
so if anybody has a solution by this so tell me…
You can make every pppoe session Static. This way the graph will dissapear every time the client disconnect, but when he connects again you will see all the graphs as a simple queue client.
use this script
:foreach x in=[/ppp sec find] do={
:global user [/ppp sec get $x name];
/int pppoe-serv add user=$user name=$user service=(yours-pppoe-servicename)
}