The change log is not comprehensive. Shouldn’t it include all changes when moving the release candidate to it’s own thread?
I’m referring to the following changes which fix packet loss due to bridges learning IP neighbor mac address on blocked STP ports, easily reproducible in a simple ABC triangle.
Originally reported:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/v6-44-3-stable-is-released/129680/122
Discussed this in more detail via a support ticket where some items were simply ignored, for example that LLDP RFC details that link local discovery shouldn’t be forwarded by bridges.
Annoying not to ever get feedback when reported problems are worked on, undercuts the good work that is being done and often doesn’t allow the original reporter to test and provide feedback while the developers’ memory regarding the changes is fresh…
From somewhere in the middle of 6.47 beta:
*) discovery - do not send discovery packets on inactive bonding slave interfaces;
*) discovery - do not send discovery packets on interfaces that are blocked by STP;