I found this after upgrade 3.30 to 4.13,
even after reset jumper on my routerboard 450G, still same result :
In Winbox → /ip route —> first, default gateway 0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.101.200.1 (without routing mark)
then i add second route, with routing mark → 0.0.0.0/0 gateway=192.168.100.10 routing-mark=linux
when i open via webbox, i saw the “Default Gateway” change to 192.168.100.10, in my logic it should be 10.101.200.1 since it’s the first and default gateway i set from winbox.
Anyone know why this happen? is this a bug? or it’s just normal “false positive”?
Before the 5.x beta webbox is at best a toy for the most simplest of SOHO deployments, and won’t be able to show - for example - more than one default gateway, picking the last when multiple exist. Since webbox is gone in 5.x and has been replaced by webfig (which has all the options winbox has) that probably will not change.
Thank for sharing, but i even found a further “false” of this webbox, i add more route (about 11 route) like this :
0 A S ;;; Linux
0.0.0.0/0 10.131.206.1 1
1 A S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.105.10 1
2 A S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.105.10 1
3 A S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.105.10 1
4 A S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.1 1
5 A S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.1 1
6 X S 0.0.0.0/0 10.131.206.1 1
7 A S 0.0.0.0/0 10.131.206.1 1
8 A S 0.0.0.0/0 10.131.206.1 1
9 X S 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.105.9 1
10 A S 0.0.0.0/0 10.131.206.1 1
11 A S ;;; added by setup
0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.1 1
the #11 route is the first one i create from setup for default gateway, but then after i add more route it became the #11, and if it picking the last when multiple exist, why the “Default Gateway” in webbox still point to #0, so somehow, webbox point at row #0 to be the “Default Gateway”.
Then why route Linux #0 stay at that #0 row, while it’s originated from the second rule i create after the first rule for gateway setup. Other route #1~#10 are the route i create after that.
Right - I was trying to convey that I think it is doubtful that any webbox bugs will ever be fixed seeing how it is completely removed from the current RC. Why fix something you’re replacing?
More interestingly: Why do you have the same routes repeated over and over again?
Aha, u got the point!! thanks. Unfortunatelly i still dun have a gut to try RouterOS ver.5.xx, i’m not sure…hehhe
And about repeatedly route, it’s for specific purpose, i use tcp_outgoing on my squid box, divided each specific ACL going to specific Lan Card IP and each of that IP have specific queue. It’s just a coincident that for now it must go to same gateway, make me to have flexibility if i need to change to other gateway only for specific Squid ACL.
And also i use /ip route rule, to “hard force” route specific Lan src-address to go diffrent gateway.