Hi
Does anyone knows any information related to the launch of this model? Why is such mystery?
There is no employee that can help us in this issue??
- hAP ac + AEBS: no ports headroom
- RB3011 ac: 2 switches, no go
So it has to be the CRS ac version (triple chain).
But it’s too powerful without 2x SFP+ (routing)
Maybe I’ll hold on via wAP ac.
Of course, SFP+ means at least 5GBase-T next year. It might be already obsolete then.
Once again, CCR1009-4G would be the immediate way, if it could single stream at 5Gbps. I don’t have much hope then.
T2080
Is there any hope to see these device soon?
It’s not coming, you need to accept this. I’m sorry.
Still waiting for it.
RB3011UiAS-RM is too big.
RB850Gx2 do not have enough ethernet ports. At least 8.
CRS’s performance is poor.
CCR1009-8G-1S-PC is too expensive.
My prediction, based on logic jumps so take it with a grain of salt.
Mikrotik will skip the 3011UiAS-2HnD-IN and release TWO updated product lines.
- Updated CRS line with the new Qualcom IPQ 40XX. This will also replace the 2011/3011 line.
- Updated DIY/Integrated/Home & Office platforms using the Qualcomm IPQ 40XX and supporting Wave2 802.11ac
I was surprised to see the announcement of the 3011 using the same form factor as the 2011 when the CRS’s design was so much newer and better.
Mikrotik is aiming at soho market segment by these devices so it cannot be fat and cannot have two rows of ports and cannot be gray. Anyway, the 2011 “in” enclosure is most pretty case that mikrotik has ever done. That’s my own personal opinion.
Update by more powerful and cheaper cpu is necessary and adding 2hnd plus 5acT at once is a must for soho segment.
Everybody’s taste is different! 
I much prefer the more professional looking CRS. We do not get the same questions and complaints from business clients now we use CRS that we did with the 2011.
Nothing against everybody’s taste. Even I like the design, from technical point of view I agree that the CRS design is better. But not so nice. Nothing more.
I’m still waiting for it.
Look: so many guys crying and asking for the device to be released. And rumors are crawling that the model might be skipped. It sounds disgusting…
The model is very, very, very attractive. If one can’t understand this, then it sounds pitiful. What else can I say? 
i hope a concurrent dual band rb3011 will be a better device, but only mikrotik have the numbers to know how sucessfull was the RB2011UiAS-2HnD-I
to justify this device
Yes, I can confirm that many our customer inquiring this version RouterBoard or version with dual Wi-Fi RB3011UiAS-5HacT2HnT. Its pity that Mikrotik has so closed policy and hasn’t any roadmap for this or future years..
Height should fit this:
http://www.thomann.de/gb/adam_hall_ablage_19_1heauszugschiene.htm?ref=prod_rel_197335_6
stil no news on the RB3011UiAS-2HnD-IN??
nice that mikrotik has it on the product catalog
http://download2.mikrotik.com/2015-Q4.pdf
page: 49
I have been told that the success of the RB3011UiAS-RM has left the ARM chipset in short supply. So Mikrotik is focusing on building and shipping the RB3011UiAS-RM using these parts. And will introduce the RB3011UiAS-2HnD-IN next year when they can source enough chipsets.
I would like to see it to ship with an additional miniPCI-e slot and knock outs for additional antennas. That would keep the cost down and allow us to add a second radio.
Tom
It will support hardware acceleration?
Not until RouterOS v7
So not until next year at the earliest
It mean “Yes, but software not support yet”? Or will be new hardware revision?