I have a theoretical question. Everybody knows that unlimited p2p is a killer for 2.4 Ghz netrworks. What’s the main factor? Amount of data to handle, too many connections, too big pps rate or anything else?
Piotr
I have a theoretical question. Everybody knows that unlimited p2p is a killer for 2.4 Ghz netrworks. What’s the main factor? Amount of data to handle, too many connections, too big pps rate or anything else?
Piotr
Its like a ddos on your network ![]()
I think because wireless is half duplex is teh problem
People upload and download at the same time
yes, Equis is correct as p2p is upload and download but wifi card in only half duplex (unless it is dual nstream)
how much killing are we talking? number? i’m about to be providing to some residental appartments and this would be useful info.
btw; i though even nstream 1 combats the half duplex issue..i have little expericne with it however.
thanks.
Problem is too many connections at the same time. It kills even LAN.
im aware of this, i just was curious as to how big the impact on wireless.. specifically when serving laptop clients.
i have one hotel install and on that a que set at 256k upstream and that is generally full always..and i can still get individual 2.4g users with > -83 rssi downloading/ bursting to 3mbit (max of the line) and pings across to a wds repeater still average ~10ms ..this is the only results i know of / have. tks
Wireless is especialy weak on that because of it’s nature: time sharing. It simply does not handle large number of small packets well. That’s why p2p, some network gaming and VoIP, are always a problem.
I would say its the small packets that cause the most problems. Nstream assists because of its packet packing and polling mechanisms.
I supply a few student accommodation sites via a wireless backhaul and NStream deals with the torrent traffic nicely.
any pp/s or Mbit numbers? or actual number of IP address running p2p vs impact on latency?
just trying to plan ahead for a link im setting up..
thanks