I have tried dst-nat and a few other things I could think of and nothing seems to work.
I can’t beleive there is no way to make this happen, I would prefer to use MT on 20 or so of my deployments but if I can’t access multipule MT units from behind my load balancers I will have to go with other router software. I found 2 others that will allow remote management through port fowarding.
Perhaps MT guys can change WinBox in the next release to allow us to choose the port we want to use.
yea i think this is the most asked question across the board…since im assuming you are needing to access many MT boxes Nat’d Behind 1 public IP the best and easiest solution is setup a quick / easy pptp vpn server on the MT router ( you ARE routing with mt RIGHT ) ) and then vpn in, and winbox to each MT’s IP …or do an EoIP tunnel between two MT’s and macWINBOX it up…
i’m sure there is a good reason we cant easily change the winbox port…
I am setting up my deployments with a Pep-Link 7-WAN load balancer.
My sites will have aprox 3000 concurrent users and I dont think a single MT x86 box can handle this amount of users. This is why I need to use several.
The load blancers are on public IP’s and the MT boxes are sitting on LAN ports 1~4. I can setup port fowarding and/or virtual servers in the load balancer but this does no good if WinBox can only access on a single port at 8291
If this is the most asked question accross the board why hasn’t MT done something about it?
The peplink equipment is complete crap! their tech support is good and helpful but the product is horrible…it ONLY HAS A WEB INTERFACE. What i tested was the Peplink Balence 300 it was a nightmare and actually was the reason I found MT hardware (as ironic as it is i WAS already using MT stuff on APs but i did not know it..)
Use MT if possible…peplink will take back the product and give you a refund as they did with me but there is only os much you can do with a web interface…
with reguards to your question remaing about the winbox port you didnt say why you cant use VPN…you may have a good reason but you have not stated it…just vpn into one of the RB’s and connect from there…
The reason I use Peplink is for load balancing 7 WAN connections.
I have 2 in use now and have had no issues with them. As far as having web interface only, I dont have an issue with that as all I use it for is Load Balancing and virtual server setup to redirect ports to my other server and to my MT boxes