When mikrotik releasing the wireguard? All platform released that !!!
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=WireGuard-Debuts-macOS
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
\
I think you did not read until the end
On the Linux kernel front for the long-awaited mainlining of the WireGuard kernel bits, there is unfortunately nothing new to report. It doesn’t look like WireGuard will be merged for Linux 5.1 as the code has yet to be staged in net-next. When I asked Donenfeld about it on Saturday, he said he expects to have a new revision of those patches available for review soon and that work is happening behind the scenes.
quoting OP:
vs
quoting article which OP linked:
But sadly on the Linux front, the kernel bits still have yet to be mainlined.
Windows client is still on its way but is taking a while due to writing a new TUN driver for Windows 7 and newer.
lets summarize it:
- Specs are subject to change and whole code is in experimental stage (source: https://www.wireguard.com/#work-in-progress )
- Author of WireGuard released client for iOS and macOS only. (minor mobile and desktop platforms)
- There is no stable client for windows (major desktop platform)
- There is no stable client for linux (major mobile and server platform)
- All clients are so far developed by author of WireGuard, not by platform developers itself so there is no native implementation in any of systems.
- In reality it is a one-man project which means if Jason gets bored, the project is dead.
- Jason even owns a trademark on logo and name! That is so typical for “start free, become paid” platforms…
So in the end, you want mikrotik staff to implement a platform, which is officially considered to be in experimental stage, therefore will be outdated within couple of weeks or months (and will require developers attention to fix it again), It can bring hidden fees at any single time due to trademarked name or can disappear anytime if author decides to do something else?
I really like all things promised by wireguard but we really don’t need another unstable attempt for tunnel, which will deplete resources of developers even more. We didn’t even got an OpenVPN over UTP yet. EoIP crashes whenever it transmits an STP frame. ROMON is not stable when it runs through VPLS or EoIP on CHR, bridged VLANs don’t really work on CHR, Whole CCR1072 will freeze in when src-nat runs out of available ports… I could go on but I think you already got my point - I don’t think we should ask for another unstable technology.
That’s not true! I personally used MikroTik’s OpenVPN over UTP…
… at least Cat 5E and Cat6, also S/FTP and possibly others, various 802.11something, even 10BASE2 coax, I think. And yes, I know it’s childish joke. 
But on topic, once WireGuard makes in into Linux kernel, most of your concerns should go away. As I understand it, lot of people like it, so it won’t die. And they won’t let it in if it’s not under GPL.
Just because it isn’t mainlined doesn’t mean it isn’t available. I’ve been using it in production for months via DKMS and I’m very happy with it. There are open source Windows clients available, performance is great and setup is so refreshingly easy compared to something like IPSec. And it’s actually built to only use secure crypto, unlike many options in Mikrotik which allow (or even require for HW accel) deprecated or obsolete ciphers.
You owe me 15 minutes of my life! 
I was looking for post from Normis where he confirmed there is no plan for such feature.
And of course, only after that I read your little text…
@vecernik87: Sorry. But you should be looking for this much more interesting post.
I knew it! It will happen!
… and then the rest of bugs I mentioned plzzzz
Its a promise for your grand children. 6.43.13, 6.43.14, 6.43.15… 6.43.aa, 6.43.ab, 6.43.ac…
6.44.1, …6.44.aa
6.45.1,…6.45.aa
6.001.1, …6.001.aa
6.999.1…6.999.aa…6.999.aaa…6.999.aaaa
zzzzzzzzz 15 minutes… more like 15 years LOL.
We use Veeam backup solution at work and today’s newsletter was pointing to the following blog article. You will learn, why Veeam has switched to WireGuard. Seems like days of OpenVPN are over in maybe not so distant future …
As of today WireGuard is part of the Linux Kernel:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd
This should open the road for MikrotTik to easily integrate WireGuard into RouterOS.
Don’t expect this to happen tomorrow.
As of today, it was released into Linux 5.6 kernel to the general public.
As of today (and a lot of days before) MikroTik is using the long term supported kernel (4.x) for Ros7. So it wil take a while.
Also highly interested in support for WireGuard 
Kind regards,
Philippe.
Any news about wireguard?
Internal builds with wireguard support are rumored to exist.
Search the v7 section for details.
wait for wireguard
can anyone please help me to configuring wireguard
i setup peer and wg interface
but traffic cant go throw the tunnel
There is a good tutorial here from Rick Frey
what are you talking about… if its a beta version you are in the wrong forum bud.
Try here…
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewforum.php?f=1