Hello,
I tried to create a mesh network but using my eth1 port:
/-- RB751
Server ---- LAN -- Switch -- RB751
\-- RB751
I need a mesh cloud in my warehouse.
I created mesh interface with eth1+wlan1.
Ip is on mesh interface. When I done this on the second RB I lost access to the firs RB751.
Just set up each wired node as an access point, running the same ssid on a different channel - assuming all access points are running on the same network which your diagrams kind of suggests it is.
Thats correct. Your devices will only see one ssid as they are all on the same channel. You will never just see 1 when scanning with mikrotik or any other scanner
Hello, I have the same topology like you. Did you solve your problem please?
Solution with bridged wifi and ethernet on each RB751 doesn’t connect clients to AP with the most strenght signal
…even If I create ACL for signals i.e. -70-120
I too am curious about this.
I have Groove’s at a site. Setting them same SSID different channels same security works, but this location has a lot of tablets running around… sales people… when they jump from AP to AP they disconnect just long enough to time out their hosted web sales app.. i want to use mesh with AP’s all connected to same LAN via ethernet so they stay connected when running around site. thanks
I disagree. Transparent transition between APs is normal behavior. It is implemented in client’s wireless card. When signal from AP is falling below defined level (usually bellow -80dBm) client starts searching for another AP with same SSID and better signal. Then associates to better AP. Only thing that is noticeable is about 1 second gap (depending on client’s wireless card, but all devices I tested lost no more then two pings).
This is required to accomplish this:
same SSID for all APs
different channels on overlapping APs
all APs connecting clients to the same network (same DHCP server)
identical security settings on all APs
This is exactly what CAPsMAN does - it is a wireless controller.
Some vendors developed accelerated roaming between APs. For example: APs communicate with each other and exchange association data to speed up client’s connection to new AP (this is done by controller). Client’s authentication on target AP is quicker. Gap is reduced. That’s all. There is 802.11r (fast roaming) for example. Maybe MikroTik will implement it in the future but it is only needed for voice communication. Everything else will work fine without fast roaming.
That’s all well and good, but it is not transparent handoff like one would expect when using that term. Think 3G/4G handoff. That is not possible with standard 802.11. The decision to switch is the client’s, and there is no coordination.