Any chance now or in the near future for Zerotier to work on CCR1xxx (TILE) ???
I double the question. We have TILE on all our branches, and it looks like all new features are closed to non-arm users.
I think ARM owns MT 
I am asking for a zero trust cloudflare tunnel be made a package so its available to all MT devices not just arm ( via complicated additional container required ).
I understand why we don’t get it, but I would love the ability to create our own packages for installation. That would solve most of the feature request. Lock it down behind a required trusted certificate or something. Think how useful it would be for integrators, and for those willing to cross compile into architectures like tile and mipsbe.
Let me add one more thing.
Think of a script bundle with the scheduler already configured as a minimal functionality. I’m sure many of you would find that useful.
Most of the new products are ARM based. It makes sense to put all effort into one platform, this makes it all easier and makes development faster
(Not to mention that they are all features that were not included in the version of RouterOS with which the machines were sold…)
@Rex
That’s a poor argument IMHO.
When Windows was first launched (or MacOS or iOS or Android if you want) there were also no apps like Whatsapp, Spotify, Netflix, …
HW did not change because of it (apart from the logical evolution in processing power and memory).
There is a difference between purely HW-related features (e.g. HW offloading to switch chip) and SW-related features.
For me Zerotier (like Wireguard) is purely SW. OK, you need the processor and the memory but otherwise, no special HW is needed.
Great, so I can trade in my CCR1009 and get full value for an RB5009 ???
Please send me the email address for the “Mikrotik Trade in your Non-ARM Device Program”
[ Word of advice Normunds, stick to support, Product PR/Sales is not your forte! ]
If that was true THEN your developers would have BGP/BFD done by now on 7.x … and very surprising that it is not for ARM …
above arguments about apps are completely unrelated. don’t you all remember the famous case with Apple?
3rd party apps are completely different than core functionality. Rex is right
Agree and fully support the position. I would rather see the core development of Router OS move faster than adding other features. Thats why I think an open package format with necessary security, signing, and whatnot could be beneficial for those willing to take the time to create packages that add specialized functionality that otherwise wouldn’t make sense as a container. Put it behind a warning enabling like the containers is.
Keep up the great development!
I’m the first of the skeptics with v7 and my balls are spinning that the user-manager as it was is gone…
But I can’t deny that despite the constant complaints of problems with v7,
since I installed my eBGP router has never crashed and the memory hasn’t run out…
Great…
But I would like to see feature parity with v6, rather than new v7 features imported on older v6 models…
Just went through a Router OS 7 MTCINE course and needless to say, most of it had to be completed in 6. The MPLS with BPG/l2vpn/vpn4 section was rough on 7 and flat out didn't work. I like the direction it is heading, and I understand the growing pains, but I also understand the frustration operators have.
Can you name exact things that did not work? yes, BFD is missing, but otherwise things are working fine.
We were on the latest beta 7.8 on some ac2’s. None of the tunnels distributed over BGP would come up. He was excited to see the sending blackhole routes over a multi hop BGP session was working.
I’ll run home at lunch and get the notes made and if you want send them in to you or support.
User-manager missing as “user-manager”, not a new concept of “user-manager”,
like the new taskbar on windows 11, it’s not a taskbar anymore, now it’s just something that looks like the taskbar, now it has all productive elements removed…
How to remove the web part from the user-manager, goodbye previous productivity…
cfikes, yes, it would be helpful.
Will do!
I am not surprized, and he uses the least amount of words… so efficient. 