Community discussions

 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:46 am

*) upnp - fixed missing in-interface option for dynamic dst-nat rules;
*) upnp - added comment for dynamic dst-nat rules to inform what host/program required it;
Nice enhancement!

Image
This enhancement got me in to "Teredo disabling spree" on all office PCs with Win10 this weekend... why it is enabled by default?
Yes, thanks for the feature it makes it much easier to manage dst-nat now.
its funny, cuz its my favorite defaults (not only for Win10 machines).
using ADK or DISM or even better NTLite(which isn't free, sadly) - you can customize such(or many other things with ease in both installed machines and installation images/mediums).
but prohibiting unauthorized teredo, 6to4, isatap and other transitioning tech(including ipip, ipoe and other protocols, including restricting ipv6 itself) - is generally good practice not only from terms of security.

p.s.
you may also notice, that MS put into default win10 images somewhat quirky "debug adapter" and other WWAN miniports, annoying just like how WU repeatedly re-install ISATAP in past years. same about extra-protocols, that enabled and bound to interfaces "by default" aswell. or services(how many use "workstation" or "server" services in small offices, w/o AD usage ? for example).
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:52 am

i not know what those "kernel improvements" mean exactly, but they improve things a Lot, actually.
even in trivial tasks, such as web broswing or using winbox(both generic stuff or using built-in wiki viewer ;) - response improved Notably. i not know how much MicroTik paid for updated SDK/Compiler for MIPS(i doubt they use GCC. especially for wireless module), but it definitely Worthy thing. i just hope its not break something other(like security flaws and etc).
 
vosgessystemes
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:08 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:54 pm

@Mikrotik When do you get out the stable version of 6.34 ? This month ? After ?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:54 pm

6.34rc36 version will be released today.

Changes since previous version:
*) dhcpv6-client - fix ia lifetime check;
*) ipsec - fixed kernel failure after underlying tunnel has been disabled/enabled;
*) ipsec - prioritize proposals;
*) ipsec - support multiple DH groups for phase 1;
*) log - reopen log file if deleted;
*) netinstall - fix apply default config;
*) packing - fix tcp/udp checksums when simple packing is used;
*) tile - make sure that SFP rj45 modules that use forced 1G FD settings work correctly after system reboot;
*) tile - fix ipsec freeze after SA updates;
*) wireless - added WPS buttons support on hAP and hAP ac lite.

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash.
 
sx10
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:46 am
Location: Portland, OR USA

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:56 pm

I'm really excited to see all these great enhancements and fixes, but is there any end in sight for 6.34? It's been in RC for over 2 months and you're still adding new features. I'd really like to get some of these enhancements in production. Any plans for a release date?
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:40 pm

i was just only hope that WPS buttons support in newer RB - dind't become part of "default config", because its make wifi exploitable as hell :/
also would like bit reduced "default" TX powers in 2x and 3x WiFi-enabled devices (2-4Db should be enough? someone can do math better, perhaps)
(to avoid legal problems with early adopters/Rockie networkers, not familar with regulations/restrictions aswell as to reduce EMI).
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:38 am

@strods
*) ipsec - prioritize proposals;
*) ipsec - support multiple DH groups for phase 1;
Can you explain it? How it works?

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5942
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:26 am

Now you can choose multiple DH groups in phase1
and all the chosen protcols are sorted from strongest to weakest protocol before sending proposals to remote peer.
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:14 pm

@mrz
Now you can choose multiple DH groups in phase1
and all the chosen protcols are sorted from strongest to weakest protocol before sending proposals to remote peer.
Thanks a lot, it looks that currently this option is supported only from command-line, not from Winbox.
And what about *) ipsec - prioritize proposals;?

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5942
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:36 pm

second part of the sentence
all the chosen protocols are sorted from strongest to weakest protocol before sending proposals to remote peer.
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:01 pm

@mrz
Thanks, I thought that it was separate functionality.

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:29 am

6.34rc39 version has been released.

Changes since previous version:

*) dude - The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated;
*) dude - dude RouterOS package added for tile and x86 (CHR) architecture;
*) dude - initial work on dude integration into RouterOS;
*) chr - fix SSH key import on AWS;
*) crs212 - fix 1Gbps ether1 linking problem;
*) timezone - use backward timezone aliases;
*) lte - support serial port for DellWireless 5570;
*) lte - improved dhcp handling on interfaces that doesn't support it;
*) ipsec - allow my-id address specification in main mode;
*) dhcpv6 client - fix remove when client reappears on restart;
*) default config - fix for hAP family devices with one wireless;
*) firewall - added inversion support for "limit" option;
*) firewall - added bit rate matching for "limit" option;
*) firewall - improved performance for "limit" option.

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash.
 
Ghazaryan
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:29 am

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:51 am

Hi everybody I have question about traffic flow in my router 6.32.3.In this version TX trafic does not show in ether2 (local) show only rx traffic, ether3 (internet) i can not see local trafic rx i know about it
( http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Traffic_Flow ),i add more interfaces but dont see
how can i read local RX and TX traffics in the old version 4.11 it work ok
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:42 am

Version 6.34rc41 has been released.

Changes since previous version:

*) mipsle - architecture support dropped (last fully supported version 6.32.3);
*) mac-telnet - fixed backspace when typing login username;
*) address-list - properly remove unused address-lists from drop-downs;
*) sstp - allow ECDHE when pfs enabled;
*) lte - fixed info command for Cinterion EHS5-E modem;
*) fast-path - fixed kernel crash on on/off;
*) fetch - fixed closure after 30 seconds;
*) ppp - fixed rare kernel crash (introduced in v6.33);
*) ppp - do not allow empty name ppp secrets;
*) licensing - fixed that some old 7 symbol keys could not be upgraded;
*) ssh - fixed possible kernel crash;
*) console - fixed crash on creating variable with "?" in it;
*) winbox - fixed tab names to correspond to console;
*) webfig - fixed firewall connection-bytes option;
*) webfig - fixed switch port "default vlan id" has missing "auto" value.

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash.
 
dadaniel
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 11:51 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:59 am

Why is to-adresses column not enabled by default? No need to write to-addresses in comment field...!

*) upnp - added comment for dynamic dst-nat rules to inform what host/program required it;
Nice enhancement!

Image
 
User avatar
macgaiver
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1721
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Sol III, Sol system, Sector 001, Alpha Quadrant

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:14 am

Why is to-adresses column not enabled by default? No need to write to-addresses in comment field...!
Now all views are saved, so you can select it yourself and use it. Each configuration have it's unique important fields, you can't keep everyone happy.
With great knowledge comes great responsibility, because of ability to recognize id... incompetent people much faster.
 
serjrd
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:24 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:37 am

CCR-1072, 6.34rc39
Just now got this message in my console:

jan/19/2016 10:25:21 system,error,critical System rebooted because of kernel failure
jan/19/2016 10:25:21 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shutdown, probably kernel failure

I can only attribute this to enabling fasttrack, but it wasn't an immediate reaction to that and happened in about 30-60 seconds after it.

Emailed you an autosupout.rif file.
Is there anything else I can send you to be able to track this down?
Last edited by serjrd on Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:42 am

Oh no. Mipsle support drop during subminor version development? What happened? Is it for always?
 
ebreyit
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:44 am
Location: Shropshire, United Kingdom

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:43 am

Is there anything else I can send you to be able to track this down?
If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash.

Think they get everything they need from this unless it involves external factors where packet captures also come in handy
Last edited by ebreyit on Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
macgaiver
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1721
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Sol III, Sol system, Sector 001, Alpha Quadrant

Re:

Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:01 am

Oh no. Mipsle support drop during subminor version development? What happened? Is it for always?
It looks like it - same thing happened to 6.33.5 also - check download page.
anyway - support period was impressive, my last mipsle purchase was in 2008.
With great knowledge comes great responsibility, because of ability to recognize id... incompetent people much faster.
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:15 pm

*) address-list - properly remove unused address-lists from drop-downs;
how it suppose to work?

i create a address-list TEST1
set up a demo Nat with src-address-list=TEST1>apply>ok

delete the address-list TEST1
go to nat but the address-list=TEST1 on demo nat still there
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:25 pm

raffav - This change is for situation like this but after you have disabled address-list of firewall rule in past you could see this list still in drop down menu but now you can not.

Of course it will still exist in such case. You can type anything under address list fields in firewall rules. You do not have to have actual entries in address list.
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:42 pm

raffav - This change is for situation like this but after you have disabled address-list of firewall rule in past you could see this list still in drop down menu but now you can not.

Of course it will still exist in such case. You can type anything under address list fields in firewall rules. You do not have to have actual entries in address list.
hum...

so to clean up the "old address-list" need to disable the address-list field on the rule and re enable it?


and what is the propose to type anything on the address-list? i.e: make a rule only work in some situation like dynamic address-list ?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:17 pm

raffav - if you set anything on any firewall rule address-list fields then it will show up as a hint in other firewall rules under address-list fields. In past if you did add something on this field and after that did remove it, then it still showed up in drop list even it was not active anywhere. Now that is fixed.
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:02 pm

hAP ac lite - In Quick Set please make WISP AP DUAL
It is missing
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re:

Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:08 am

Oh no. Mipsle support drop during subminor version development? What happened? Is it for always?
some obsoleted mips branches - already deprecated by linux kernel and toolchain long ago
(some LTS kernels and compilers are remain slightly-maintained, but its not really as great a moving upstream are).
so apparently MikroTik - moved upstream and updated some code.
other xxk and smips - are still supported by, as you can notice.
i can only guess that implementing some things - may eventually break mipsle support, even without moving upstream(partially cause less maintained toolchain for, maybe)
but removing "legacy" 5.xx ROS from download for SMIPS - make no sense, contrary(and eventually result in series of "conspiraction theorists" "explanations" ;)
 
andriys
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:59 pm
Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine

Re: Re:

Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:40 am

but removing "legacy" 5.xx ROS from download for SMIPS - make no sense
Removing? SMIPS is a relatively recent beast, RouterOS v5.x for SMIPS has never existed.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24272
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Re:

Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:54 am

but removing "legacy" 5.xx ROS from download for SMIPS - make no sense
Removing? SMIPS is a relatively recent beast, RouterOS v5.x for SMIPS has never existed.
MIPS-LE was removed. Not SMIPS.

MIPS-LE were really old devices, like the RB112. They never worked good with v6.
SMIPS never existed for v5.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: Re:

Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:54 am

but removing "legacy" 5.xx ROS from download for SMIPS - make no sense
Removing? SMIPS is a relatively recent beast, RouterOS v5.x for SMIPS has never existed.
sorry, that MY mistake, obviously.
"thinking bout MIPSLE and looking intoo SMIPS" or/and vice versa effect, apparently, thanks to new "download" section appearance, which is more eye-stressfull, but direct.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: Re:

Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:11 pm

but removing "legacy" 5.xx ROS from download for SMIPS - make no sense
Removing? SMIPS is a relatively recent beast, RouterOS v5.x for SMIPS has never existed.
MIPS-LE was removed. Not SMIPS.

MIPS-LE were really old devices, like the RB112. They never worked good with v6.
SMIPS never existed for v5.
MIPS-LE is not only RB112, but for example RB133 or RB532 which are still well supported by 6.32.3. Maybe also by 6.33.x, but I dont have such experience as I do not use this version in production. Your statement that thay never worked good with v6 is obviously not true. I still do not understand why the support for MIPS-LE was dropped so suddenly.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:20 pm

Why dude opened ports are not shown / manageable by IP - Services? All services provided by router should be listed there.

Citation from documentation http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Services:
This document lists protocols and ports used by various MikroTik RouterOS services. It helps you to determine why your MikroTik router listens to certain ports, and what you need to block/allow in case you want to prevent or grant access to the certain services. Please see the relevant sections of the Manual for more explanations.
I would like to see there also all PPP servers and other services like UPNP, DNS, DHCP, NTP, SNMP and all others (even not manageably) to have one place where all active ports on the device are shown at once giving full overview to the administrator to know what ports are currently opened. Well, this part is more a "feature request" for aligning the reality with documentation than question. I admit.
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6616
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:48 am

jarda, ip services include RouterOS used servers (most of them), however some of them are not included that are configuration optional (for example PPTP server, OVPN server or The Dude server).
Thank you for the feature suggestion about The Dude, currently it will stay under /dude, later we will see what we can do.
 
bommi
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:13 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:29 pm

*) sstp - allow ECDHE when pfs enabled;
Does this mean you switched to a newer openssl library in this version?
When will it be possible to connect to the webinterface using pfs with dhe or ecdhe?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 2:31 pm

6.34rc45 version has been released.

Changes since previous version:

*) capsman - fix radius accounting stop message;
*) cerm - allow to sign certificates from imported CAs created with RouterOS;
*) ldp - fix MPLS PDU max length;
*) net - improve 64bit interface stats support;
*) routerboard - print factory-firmware version in routerboard menu;
*) snmp - add oid from ucd mib for total cpu load OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.52.0;
*) winbox - add extra items automaticly to multiline fields if at least one of them is required;
*) winbox - implemented full ipv6 dhcp client;
*) winbox - update blocked flag if user changed blocked field in dhcp server lease;
*) winbox/webfig - fixed version column ordering in ip neighbors list.

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash.
 
User avatar
BartoszP
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:13 pm
Location: Poland

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:52 pm

*) routerboard - print factory-firmware version in routerboard menu;
Do I check correct menu ?
411.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Real admins use real keyboards.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24272
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:55 pm

"print" refers to command line
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
vosgessystemes
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:08 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:05 pm

I have a 404 error on the Dude package URL : http://download.mikrotik.com/dude-6.34rc45-tile.npk

Normal ?

Br
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24272
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:06 pm

I have a 404 error on the Dude package URL : http://download.mikrotik.com/dude-6.34rc45-tile.npk

Normal ?

Br
Try this URL http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... 34rc45.npk
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
vosgessystemes
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:08 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:08 pm

I have a 404 error on the Dude package URL :
http://download.mikrotik.com/dude-6.34rc45-tile.npk

Normal ?

Br
Try this URL http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... 34rc45.npk
Perfect ! Have you a changelog for this package ? Any fix since dude-6.34rc41.npk ?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24272
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:10 pm

Perfect ! Have you a changelog for this package ? Any fix since dude-6.34rc41.npk ?
Special topic for that http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 82#p517782
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
IPANetEngineer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:40 pm

We have an issue that has been reported to support and wanted to see how many others are having the same issue.

When using MPLS Traffic Engineering tunnels and MP-BGP with VRFs, if the BGP peering goes down and back up, traffic stops forwarding until the Traffic Engineering interface is disabled and re-enabled.

When looking at a packet capture, it appears the outer label is missing in the MPLS label stack. Once the TE interface is bounced, the label shows back up in the capture.

Has anyone else run into this or similar issues with deploying Traffic Engineering tunnels?
Global - MikroTik Support & Consulting - English | Francais | Español | Portuguese +1 855-645-7684
https://iparchitechs.com/services/mikro ... l-support/ mikrotiksupport@iparchitechs.com
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:50 am

Here we are using several VPLS and also this fall and coming back after a few minutes,
with version 6.33.5 (stable) in RB1100AHx2, RB1100AH
 
Ulypka
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:26 am

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:41 pm

i have similar problem with mpls
i correct this problem delete route from bgp and then advertise again
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1821
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:16 pm

We have an issue that has been reported to support and wanted to see how many others are having the same issue.

When using MPLS Traffic Engineering tunnels and MP-BGP with VRFs, if the BGP peering goes down and back up, traffic stops forwarding until the Traffic Engineering interface is disabled and re-enabled.

When looking at a packet capture, it appears the outer label is missing in the MPLS label stack. Once the TE interface is bounced, the label shows back up in the capture.

Has anyone else run into this or similar issues with deploying Traffic Engineering tunnels?
We have had the same problem.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:40 pm

so I have an issue that started with RC41. I have a CCR1036-12G-EM

after the RC41 upgrade. The router loses the ability to show files, resources and Authentication to the router takes about 3 min. I have reset the router, uninstalled Dude and rebuilt from scratch to have the same thing happen.

I was able to get it upgraded to RC45 today. Now about every 5 min the watchdog timer reboots the router.

anyone else having this issue??

I have downgraded to 6.33.5 to see if that resolves the problem.
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:56 pm

A little more info. If I turn off the watchdog timer. the system loses the ability to reboot remotely. I have to manually power off the router.
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:58 pm

It does seam that downgrading the router to 6.33.5 fixed the reboot and lockup problem.
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:31 pm

So after a while running on 6.33.5 I upgraded to 6.34rc45 It took the router almost 5 min to reboot. When it did I am right back to were i started.

The router takes about 2 min to let me log in.
It takes the file list about 5 min before it shows any files.
I have lost the ability to create a sup file or to reboot the router
I can not reset the router remotely anymore.
The system resources show's no cpu's at all
The log shows timeout while waiting for program 20

Kind of frustrating as the system was working well under RC15 but since i upgraded to RC41 and on this has been a constant problem. Are these all tested before they are released?

Additionally, on the Winbox title bar it no longer shows the router model or Identity just the login and ip
Also if i open up a terminal box it takes about 5 min to get to a prompt.
winbox.tiff
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
User avatar
IPANetEngineer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:46 pm

We have an issue that has been reported to support and wanted to see how many others are having the same issue.

When using MPLS Traffic Engineering tunnels and MP-BGP with VRFs, if the BGP peering goes down and back up, traffic stops forwarding until the Traffic Engineering interface is disabled and re-enabled.

When looking at a packet capture, it appears the outer label is missing in the MPLS label stack. Once the TE interface is bounced, the label shows back up in the capture.

Has anyone else run into this or similar issues with deploying Traffic Engineering tunnels?
We have had the same problem.
Glad to know someone else is having this issue, in working with MikroTik on the ticket we have open, it appears they have found the bug and fixed it and the fix will be included in 6.34.

Can't wait for 6.34 :-)
Global - MikroTik Support & Consulting - English | Francais | Español | Portuguese +1 855-645-7684
https://iparchitechs.com/services/mikro ... l-support/ mikrotiksupport@iparchitechs.com
 
fragtion
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:08 pm

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:18 am

In the latest Mikrotik newsletter (https://indd.adobe.com/view/c0e6f614-be ... 0ef4539904), according to Page 3, "New version of RouterOS will support single radio AP/Client for repeater support", presumably on supported models only. When can we expect this feature / in which new version of RouterOS? The news is not clear as to whether it will be the upcoming version of RouterOS, or a future version somewhere later down the line? Thank you
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:40 pm

Not specific to this release, but there should be a bus selection option for USB Power reset under WinBox for RB922 (and probably others using differentiated bus lines for USB and PCIe USB):
NetMetal_USB_Reset.jpg
This issue makes it impossible to use USB power reset from WinBox.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: 6.34 release candidate version topic!

Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:30 pm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 101 guests