Community discussions

 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:18 pm

A WiFi TDMA mode that is compatible with UBNT airMAX.
We usually have a mix of MikroTik/UBNT access points and clients in our network so we can only use bare 802.11 even when TDMA would perform much better.
Alternative: an IEEE standard for this mode that is implemented by both companies.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:36 am

Netinstall for Linux, or documentation of the netinstall process so it can be programmed for Linux by someone else.
 
diode
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:24 pm

Having an integrated 5 GHz Backup in LHG 60.

Now I need to mount 2 dishes plus a HEX POE for power ...
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2989
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 2:29 pm

A WiFi TDMA mode that is compatible with UBNT airMAX.
We usually have a mix of MikroTik/UBNT access points and clients in our network so we can only use bare 802.11 even when TDMA would perform much better.
Alternative: an IEEE standard for this mode that is implemented by both companies.
Now you'd wish manufacturers to give one of their main tools to keep clients with them away...

tdma is 'proprietary' protocol. Meaning every radio manufacturer can deviate from the IEEE standard to improve (or at least try to...) the standard on their own. Hence they do and each and every manufacturer has its own ideology and arguments to do it the way they do.

And why should Mikrotik allow Ubiquity to use their standard, or vice versa. And others?
Many wisp made a choice some years ago to go for one brand. Now they are 'married' to that brand if they use tdma. Imagine tdma could be freely used in-between brands. Mikrotik probably would have been bankrupt by then since many WISPs would over time then have move to other platforms.

And to show how complicate it is anyway. The eCambium 'elevate' product line was supposed to be working with 3rd party devices. So far after 2 years of promises it still only worked for Ubnt devices and I believe one model of Mikrotik.

So if you really want to stick to a 'multi brand' network you have to stick to plain 802.11 and to be honest, if you use 'ac' with good antennas and properly configure (RTS/CTS!) that protocol might work in several circumstances better then tdma what I already proved in some posts and just the last week still see is the case. Even after the latest ROS v.6.42.6 I have some P2MP network running in 802.11 instead of NV2 because it give much more capacity for the single client and in total over the AP...
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 2:47 pm

We are operating an amateur radio network and we do not control the manufacturer of equipment chosen by the users.
And in fact, the product gamma of the two main manufacturers has been varying over time to give preference to one or the other.
e.g. before the LHG there was no cheap MikroTik user device with some gain, the SXT was too small for many users.
UBNT has the AirGRID devices which, although single-polarization, work over longer distances.
Now with the LHG this has changed, but we still have:
- sites with UBNT AP and a mix of AirGRID and LHG/SXT clients
- sites with MikroTik AP and a mix of AirGRID and LHG/SXT clients
Pracitce shows that the UBNT AP works better in the presence of interference (less problems with spurious RADAR detection)
but the LHG is the better choice for user equipment because it uses both polarisations.

It would be nice if both of them could operate under the same managed access protocol. I have no idea of the internals
of the different protocols now in use. The term TDMA is a bit worrying, hopefully (and likely) it does not mean there is a fixed
timeslot allocation for clients. A good protocol would use some form of round-robin polling of the clients with polling priority
dropping when traffic is low. Something more like DAMA.

I think when neither MikroTIk nor UBNT come up with some openness, the IEEE should publish a standard. Then both
manufacturers can do nothing but implement that standard (possibly alongside their own offering) or they would lose all
their marketshare to a manufacturer that does.
 
User avatar
Cha0s
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 826
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:53 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 4:32 pm

Netinstall for Linux, or documentation of the netinstall process so it can be programmed for Linux by someone else.
+1

Also it would be nice if a MikroTik installation itself can be a netinstall server for another RouterBoard.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Jul 17, 2018 5:44 pm

And install of a clean new RouterOS in an inactive partition on a router with 2 or more partitions.
Router running from Active partition part0, download new npk files and do "install into part1",
optionally copy config from part0 to part1, set part1 to Active and reboot: new clean install without doing netinstall.
 
andreiroos
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:22 pm

Re: Feature requests

Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:26 pm

I saw that it is mentioned to have the ability to set limits in queues from child queues to be expressed in a percentage value of the parent, This have been mentioned about in 2012 (Saw it on tab 5). Would also like it to be implemented especially for the fact that our internet connections get throttled (shaped) at times and this would make life much easier to adjust only the parent queue to implement speed changes.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:40 pm

Winbox proxy ???

It might be nice to be able to connect to another Mikrotik using the 1st mikrotik as a proxy to be able to connect up to a 2nd Mikrotik.

Where , an admin might not be able to directly connecte to the 2nd mikrotik, but if the 1st mikrotik can mac/IP connect to the 2nd then allow a winbox proxy connection through the 1st mikrotik to a 2nd mikrotik.
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:04 am

@TomjNorthIdaho
RoMON
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RoMON

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:43 am

@TomjNorthIdaho
RoMON
RoMON works only over L2 transparent links. A proxy could be operating at IP level. A nice feature would be to add an IP-level layer to RoMON so you can
extend the RoMON network like this:

PC <---------IP link--------------->Router1<----------L2 link ----------->Router2

and then access Router2 "via RoMON" from the PC. This can now be done only at commandline-level, not winbox.
 
mikruser
Member
Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:28 pm

Re: Feature requests

Thu Jul 19, 2018 12:04 pm

do not ask me why it is necessary.
 
craterman
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:26 pm

Re: Feature requests

Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:31 pm

Please make the opportunity to make rules for the firewall with timerange starting today and ending at some time tomorrow. For example from 20:00:00 to 06:00:00
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5699
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:37 pm

[admin@rOS] /ip firewall> filter add time=

Time ::= [!]Start-End,Day
Start -- 0s..1d (time interval)
End -- 0s..1d (time interval)
Day ::= sun|mon|tue|wed|thu|fri|sat[,Day*]
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2989
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Feature requests

Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:08 am

When testing P2MP networks for best throughput and latency you need to run a test from several CPE's (in a 'all MT' network) and then switch between the different protocols and setting to see what gives best result.
Each time though the connection with AP is lost due a config change, the CPE needs to be opened up again in its winbox session. And each time all settings for the bandwidth test are gone... each time you need to fill these again..

Can bandwidth test not be made to at least remember its settings? It has to be stopped when the CPE drops the connection over the interface the test runs, but it would be o so helpful if the settings for the test just come back after the winbox session is opened again. Just click on 'run' and the test can run again..

Would make it a great time saver in troubleshooting and fine tuning P2MP networks...
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
metricmoose
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:03 am

Re: Feature requests

Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:25 am

I would like some way of hiding profiles in usermanager from the customer-facing parts, like in the signup and user pages. This would allow us to generate vouchers that will be priced differently or have different limitations than what's available on the self-signup, without making those packages available to self-signup customers.
 
wpeople
Member
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:36 pm

Re: Feature requests

Sat Jul 28, 2018 4:21 pm

Winbox proxy ???

It might be nice to be able to connect to another Mikrotik using the 1st mikrotik as a proxy to be able to connect up to a 2nd Mikrotik.

Where , an admin might not be able to directly connecte to the 2nd mikrotik, but if the 1st mikrotik can mac/IP connect to the 2nd then allow a winbox proxy connection through the 1st mikrotik to a 2nd mikrotik.
If you can connect to 1st mikrotik via TCP (ssh), than using putty, you can configure additional port forwards on the fly.
(using linux, port forward should be added at connection - windows based putty allows on the fly)

Like: ssh into box1, open putty configuration (connection/ssh/tunnels) add new tunnel: 8291 -> 192.168.1.2:8291

that means connection to localhost:8291, putty will grab those packets, push to ssh server (remote mikrotik) what forwards them to 192.168.1.2:8291 on remote site.
and vice versa
 
taduikis
Member
Member
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:53 pm

When testing P2MP networks for best throughput and latency you need to run a test from several CPE's (in a 'all MT' network) and then switch between the different protocols and setting to see what gives best result.
Each time though the connection with AP is lost due a config change, the CPE needs to be opened up again in its winbox session. And each time all settings for the bandwidth test are gone... each time you need to fill these again..

Can bandwidth test not be made to at least remember its settings? It has to be stopped when the CPE drops the connection over the interface the test runs, but it would be o so helpful if the settings for the test just come back after the winbox session is opened again. Just click on 'run' and the test can run again..

Would make it a great time saver in troubleshooting and fine tuning P2MP networks...


I use The Dude for this. Leave the Btest windows open and configure as you want..
 
Wyz4k
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:23 am

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:04 am

Please implement a proper auto channel selection that looks at the usage and noise floor of each frequency in the scanlist before choosing a channel.

And not one that just counts how many devices it sees per frequency (as per now): viewtopic.php?f=7&t=122063&p=677377#p600476
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:05 pm

Please implement a proper auto channel selection that looks at the usage and noise floor of each frequency in the scanlist before choosing a channel.

And not one that just counts how many devices it sees per frequency (as per now): viewtopic.php?f=7&t=122063&p=677377#p600476
+1
When a WISP has multiple APs with the same SSID (nv2 APs), often a client will not select the best AP but rather the 1st AP it finds.

I would like to see some client optional settings that will allow an administrator to define some parameters when scanning for an AP to connect to. Such options might include:
- Scan time prior to making a connection to an AP
- AP selection by one of the following:
-- Strongest AP signal strength
-- Best Signal To Noise ratio
-- Best estimated CCQ
-- Fastest connect receive rate

The current client scan to find an AP is not adiquate and very often does NOT select the best possible AP when there are many candidate APs to connect to.


Example … As a LAB test … If you use SuperChannel with a scan list of 5000-6000 and you have 30 APs. The clients will probably NOT select the best AP to connect to. And also some APs might never get a connection and some APs will get almost all of the client connections. There needs to be a better system for client to AP load distribution so that multiple APs balanced with near equal clients per AP.


Or one possible solution --- I suspect the current client scan for AP mechanism scans starting at the lowest frequency in the scan list then walks up through higher frequencies. I suspect a better client scan system might be to randomize the scan list search order to find an AP. Then multiple APs might have near equal client connection counts.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
DmitryAVET
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:27 am
Location: Ukraine, Mukachevo
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:07 am

Hello,

Graphing is very cool tool, but... it killing Flash when using "Store on Disk" option (Interface/Queue/Resources).

7 days = 100K+ writes to flash...

Please, add posibility to store data on external storage, like USB Flash or microSD card.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Wyz4k
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:23 am

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:13 am

Please add all items that are in wireless -> registration table to CAPSMAN -> registration table. I regularly use the last-ip column for example which is not available in CAPSMAN.
 
mlow
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:42 am

Re: Feature requests

Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:10 pm

I'm throwing this on the list a second time.
Support for RFC6939, i.e, the client link-layer address option, enabling a DHCPv6 relay to pass a client's link-layer address (MAC address) as an option (number 79) to a DHCPv6 server, whereupon the server can use that information for static lease reservation, etc.

The need for such is currently described on the DHCPv6 wikipedia page, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DHCPv6#RF ... ess_Option
 
dimonana
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:19 pm

Re: Feature requests

Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:23 pm

I'd like to ask to complete IPSEC/IKEv2 implementation.
Motivation is : lots of VPN providers - NordVPN and others - are moving to that, leaving L2TP/IPsec disappearing.
 
Lombart
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:18 am

Re: Feature requests

Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:34 am

add dual-wan mode at quickset
it realy help for us

thank you
 
liwest_alx
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:00 pm

Re: Feature requests

Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:30 pm

CRS112-8P-4S:
SNMP Oid's for PSU1 + PSU2 Voltage or at least a status.
Currently only Temperature under system health supported.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
Jotne
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 704
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Feature requests

Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:33 pm

CRS112-8P-4S:
SNMP Oid's for PSU1 + PSU2 Voltage or at least a status.
Currently only Temperature under system health supported.
So you see it under /system healt print ?
If so you can us Script/Syslog/Splunk to graph it.

See here on how I monitor Temperature.
viewtopic.php?t=137338
.
Use Splunk to monitor your MikroTik Router

MikroTik->Splunk
 
magnavox
Member
Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:03 pm

Re: Feature requests

Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:23 pm

Hi Mikrotik Staff,
any chance for implement MLPPP server ?

Read: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=66192&p=679772#p679772
Best Regards...
 
eroberts9
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 12:26 am

Re: Feature requests

Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:15 am

DFS certification for the US .
 
paulct
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:53 am

Until there is version 7, or whatever it is called. Can we get a BGP peer priority?

e.g say if you need to upgrade ROS, swap out a CCR, or reboot - each BGP is assigned a priority and receives/sends routes according to that policy in order?
e.g:
Peer 1 - default route (priority 1)
IX route server - priority 2
IX2 route server - priority 3
Private peer 1 - Priority 4
Private peer 2 - Priority 5

In that way, essential peer routes are loaded into the routing table first according to what you decide. This would help when provider A peers on a route server and you privately peer with them - rather load the routes from the route server first and so on. We know ROS is not great loading thousands of routes - but at least with this method there is some control.

Maybe even a timer or such?

Basically a stop gap solution until we have higher clocked CPU's / better software.
 
User avatar
LucZWFM
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:47 pm
Location: Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands

Re: Feature requests

Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:06 pm

Making the headers of the tables sticky, so when one scrolls down one still sees the header...

What I mean with header:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Make the gray part sticky please. It's much more comfortable that it will not dissapear when scrolling down...

Thanks!
Telecom Engineer @Sailor Telecom & ICT | Volunteer Techie @ZuidWest FM / ZuidWest TV / Stichting Repeater Bergen op Zoom
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:59 pm

Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

It would be great to have SNMP OIDs for Ethernet link speeds. (if they are there , I have not spotted them yet).

These could be very useful to detect when an Ethernet link changes link speed. Such as when what is/was supposed to be a 1-Gig link changes to a 100 meg link.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Omniflux
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:27 am
Location: Nephi, UT. USA
Contact:

Re: Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:22 pm

Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

It would be great to have SNMP OIDs for Ethernet link speeds. (if they are there , I have not spotted them yet).

These could be very useful to detect when an Ethernet link changes link speed. Such as when what is/was supposed to be a 1-Gig link changes to a 100 meg link.

North Idaho Tom Jones
$ snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.88.1 |grep ifSpeed
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.1 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.2 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.3 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.4 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.5 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.6 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.7 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.8 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.9 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.10 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.12 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.14 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.15 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.17 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.18 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.21 = Gauge32: 10000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.22 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.24 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.25 = Gauge32: 1000000000
 
User avatar
IPANetEngineer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Contact:

Re: Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:53 pm

Feature requests - SNMP OID Ethernet link speed

It would be great to have SNMP OIDs for Ethernet link speeds. (if they are there , I have not spotted them yet).

These could be very useful to detect when an Ethernet link changes link speed. Such as when what is/was supposed to be a 1-Gig link changes to a 100 meg link.

North Idaho Tom Jones
+1 !!!!!!
Global - MikroTik Support & Consulting - English | Francais | Español | Portuguese +1 855-645-7684
https://iparchitechs.com/services/mikro ... l-support/ mikrotiksupport@iparchitechs.com
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:06 pm

As was written above, this feature is already available. And has been for as long as I use RouterOS. So "that could be" and "+1" is completely meaningless.
 
User avatar
Jotne
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 704
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:25 am

It works fine on my hEX RB750Gr3
snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.0.1  .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.1 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.2 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.3 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.4 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.5 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.6 = Gauge32: 10000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.8 = Gauge32: 1000000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.9 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.10 = Gauge32: 1000000000

snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.0.1 .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: ether1-Wan
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: bridge_vlan1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: ether3
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: ether4-Win_Server
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: ether5-Linux_server
IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: pptp-in1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.8 = STRING: ether2-Cisco-Switch
IF-MIB::ifDescr.9 = STRING: bridge-vlan20
IF-MIB::ifDescr.10 = STRING: eth2-vlan20
And on hAP lite 941-2
snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.0.80 .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: wlan1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: ether1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: ether2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: ether3
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: ether4
IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: bridge

snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.0.80 .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.1 = Gauge32: 50000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.2 = Gauge32: 100000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.3 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.4 = Gauge32: 0
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.5 = Gauge32: 10000000
IF-MIB::ifSpeed.6 = Gauge32: 100000000
.
Use Splunk to monitor your MikroTik Router

MikroTik->Splunk
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 15, 2018 7:26 pm

It would be nice if there was a "print oid" output result that contained the OID for ethernet link speed.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
mikruser
Member
Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:28 pm

Re: Feature requests

Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:09 pm

Feature request: AES hardware acceleration for OpenVPN
do not ask me why it is necessary.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: Feature requests

Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:11 am

hi guys, it seems to me that it is still not possible to change the date format in dd/mm/yyyy. It would be very useful as I also work with userman reports.
Does anyone have a solution?
thank you
Valerio
 
User avatar
doneware
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 436
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 29, 2018 1:00 am

rfc 6286 - AS-wide Unique BGP Identifier for BGP-4 support for routerOS BGP.

it relaxes some strict definitions: routerid can be now an arbitrary 32 bit unsigned integer, while the older definition restricts it to "valid unicast address".
this breaks BGP compatibility with mikrotik devices right now if not taken in consideration.

in general you only need to remove the check that was required in rfc4271.

this needs to be worked out with IPv6-only devices where you don't have no IPv4 address to be used as bgp identifer.
#TR0359
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Feature requests

Wed Aug 29, 2018 1:05 am

A somewhat simple feature I would like to see in ROS.
The ability to restore a backup and have the option to "Do Not Re-Write MAC Addresses"

it would be great to be able to restore a Mikrotik and have the option to NOT re-write every ethernet & wlan & bridge MAC address
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Feature Request CLI site-survey include Radio-Name

Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:17 pm

Feature Request CLI site-survey include Radio-Name

I would like to see the CLI site-survey include "Radio-Name" in the results.
When using winbox, you can see "Radio-Name" in the site-survey results - however when using the CLI such as my example below:
/interface wireless> scan wlan1 duration=90 save-file=SiteSurvey.txt
the CLI site-survey does not include "Radio-Name" in the results.

FYI - I am using NV2
FYI - in all of my Mikrotik APs, I use radio names similar to this: Radio-Name 172-16-10-89-Mica-N/AC-2x2
FYI - I can't simply use SSID , because I have hundreds of Mikrotiks APs using the same SSID.

Without the radio-name in the survey results, it makes it difficult to quickly identify which APs are actually being seen and I have to refer back to MAC addresses and frequency to determine which AP is actually being seen.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
DummyPLUG
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:17 am

Re: Feature requests

Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:40 pm

resend syslog email if fail to send, currently any syslog email will be discard if fail to send which raise a problem if wan or mail server down.
 
Simono
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Feature requests

Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:56 pm

Support for ups APC Back-CS via USB cable.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: Feature requests

Mon Sep 03, 2018 8:35 pm

hi guys, it seems to me that it is still not possible to change the date format in dd/mm/yyyy. It would be very useful as I also work with userman reports.
Does anyone have a solution?
thank you
Valerio
news?
 
thobias
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:45 pm

Re: Feature requests

Mon Sep 03, 2018 9:22 pm

1. IP firewall address lists could include one another (or firewall rules could match multiple lists at once, e.g. "src-address-list=list1,list2").
Please this to be able to use several lists on a single rule without having to copy them together manually or by scripting.
http://prntscr.com/kq653h
Also do the same on src/dst-address and in/out-interface so we don't have to create a list if just needing a rule with two or three addresses as it makes config more neat.
 
helipos
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2016 11:32 am

Re: Feature requests

Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:14 pm

I would like to see something like triggers when an interface state changes, so router can run a script (like ip-up/ip-down on "real" Linuxes).
+1
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature requests

Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:10 pm

1. IP firewall address lists could include one another (or firewall rules could match multiple lists at once, e.g. "src-address-list=list1,list2").
Please this to be able to use several lists on a single rule without having to copy them together manually or by scripting.
http://prntscr.com/kq653h
Also do the same on src/dst-address and in/out-interface so we don't have to create a list if just needing a rule with two or three addresses as it makes config more neat.
The underlying Linux mechanism does have a "list of lists" feature so it would be easy to add a "list12" that has "list1" and "list2" as members and then specify that as src-address-list.
There is no support to have several lists or several addresses in a single firewall item. You can only do that by having several separate items and indeed that is what happens when you try that in Linux.
(you insert a simple rule with different addresses and when you look later you have several rules in your table)
 
User avatar
Moky
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:50 pm

Re: Feature requests

Wed Sep 05, 2018 3:29 pm

Hi,

I would like to suggest two things:
  1. Webproxy HTTPS support (any of two listed options or both):
    • Possibility to address HTTPS domains with SNI parameter like "tls-host" option in MikroTik filter (e.g. ability to create rules in webproxy with "tls-host").
    • MitM HTTPS decryption support with imported certificate which is trusted on client machines.
  2. NTP client option to show more information about NTP server (like "stratum" etc. - Cisco has a nice info about any configured remote NTP server).

Kind regards,
Moky
 
thobias
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:45 pm

Re: Feature requests

Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:12 pm

1. IP firewall address lists could include one another (or firewall rules could match multiple lists at once, e.g. "src-address-list=list1,list2").
Please this to be able to use several lists on a single rule without having to copy them together manually or by scripting.
http://prntscr.com/kq653h
Also do the same on src/dst-address and in/out-interface so we don't have to create a list if just needing a rule with two or three addresses as it makes config more neat.
The underlying Linux mechanism does have a "list of lists" feature so it would be easy to add a "list12" that has "list1" and "list2" as members and then specify that as src-address-list.
There is no support to have several lists or several addresses in a single firewall item. You can only do that by having several separate items and indeed that is what happens when you try that in Linux.
(you insert a simple rule with different addresses and when you look later you have several rules in your table)
But what is preventing Mikrotik from making it possible to create hidden lists from several IPs specified in a single rule or having a rule match if IP exists in list A or list B?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests