@simbus82:
/interface bridge port
add bridge=LAN horizon=1 interface="ether1 - Acantho"
add bridge=LAN horizon=1 interface="ether3 - quantility"
add bridge=LAN horizon=1 interface="ether4 - mido"
add bridge=LAN horizon=1 interface="ether5 - brini"
/ip address
add address=192.168.88.1/24 comment="default configuration" interface="ether2 - admin" network=192.168.88.0
add address=77.89.x.106/30 comment="WAN Acantho" interface="ether1 - Acantho" network=77.89.x.104
add address=192.168.1.1/24 comment="IP Quantility" interface=LAN network=192.168.1.0
add address=192.168.2.1/24 comment="IP mido" interface=LAN network=192.168.2.0
add address=192.168.3.1/24 comment="IP Brini" interface=LAN network=192.168.3.0
add address=192.168.4.1/24 comment="IP Obst" interface=LAN network=192.168.4.0
You have the WAN IP assigned to ether1, and that same interface added to the LAN bridge where you assigned private ips "on top".
When adding interfaces to bridges, IPs, services, etc should be assigned to the bridge, not to individual interfaces as this can lead to unpredictable behaviour.
On top of that you used same bridge horizon values for the interfaces in the bridge, then used the firewall...
To firewall in Layer3, wan ether port shouldn't be on the same L2 segment as the LAN ports.
What do you exactly want to achieve with such configuration?
Try removing ether1 from LAN bridge, and reboot. Does the phone register now?
I'd cleanup your configuration following best practices:
1.- Isolate WAN port (remove it form the bridge)
2.- If you want to serve different network segments:
- delete the LAN bridge
- Assign IP addresses on each ether port
3.- Create a multiple DHCP server instances, on top of each interface, so that you can control each dhcp server individually depending on network.
4.- (If you want all the networks to reach the internet) change the firewall masquerade rule to
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface="ether1 - Acantho"
too much indexable data!
