Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
blackmetal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:01 am

bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 4:36 pm

Hello,
i have a mikrotik crs 326 so i want add 4-6 filter rules if i use bridge filter rules i should except ethernet result as show on https://mikrotik.com/product/CRS326-24G-2SplusRM ?
thanks
 
User avatar
Steveocee
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1120
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:09 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:22 pm

Once you start running bridge filters you stop switching through hardware and switch through the CPU so numbers will drastically reduce.
 
blackmetal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:01 am

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:32 pm

hi,
i have following options enabled :
1. bridge enabled with no filters
2. no ip firewall rules
3. just create some switch rules
4. snmp enabled
so in this case hardware switching works with no problem ?


also i have these rules in my switching tab :
0 switch=switch1 ports=Eth2->VPS-KVM1 src-address=1.2.3.4/32 copy-to-cpu=yes redirect-to-cpu=no mirror=no

1 switch=switch1 ports=Eth2->VPS-KVM1 src-address=1.2.3.4/32 copy-to-cpu=yes redirect-to-cpu=no mirror=no

2 switch=switch1 ports=Eth2->VPS-KVM1 copy-to-cpu=no redirect-to-cpu=no mirror=no new-dst-ports=""

because i need to limit ether2 for specific ips, in this cause with above rules in switching do i have hardware switching ?
thanks
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3005
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:00 pm

bridge filters make you loose a lot of performance

switch rules dont

switch rules run by hardware at wire speed without CPU usage


i dont think you need to configure redirect to CPU action to allow packets from cpu

" A rule without any action parameters is a rule to accept the packet. "
Last edited by chechito on Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
blackmetal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:01 am

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:02 pm

ok understood,
other features like snmp or bonding or such feature does not cause loose performacne?
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3005
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:06 pm

snmp uses CPU but only for management purposes, dont affect your traffic performance

CRS 3xx supports bonding by hardware, check this info

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:C ... es#Bonding
 
blackmetal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:01 am

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:29 pm

ok last question is if i use scripts with scheduler that run script every 10 or 15 seconds (that script only check pps on each interface and shutdown them for 2m if they have more than X pps) is it cause high cpu usages or not ?
thanks
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3005
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: bridge filter reduce performacne on crs 326 ?

Fri Jun 29, 2018 10:22 pm

ok last question is if i use scripts with scheduler that run script every 10 or 15 seconds (that script only check pps on each interface and shutdown them for 2m if they have more than X pps) is it cause high cpu usages or not ?
thanks
complex scripts who take minutes, hours running consume high % of cpu while running, simple scripts generate unnoticeable cpu usage

in case of switch high cpu usage will not ralentize traffic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests