I'm about to deploy a new setup in a remote location.
This setup includes:
- two WAN connections (with two different ISPs)
- one main router (either a CRS112 or a CCR1009)
- one server (mostly for logging)
- one LAN switch (CRS328)
- 24 WiFi AP
All connections are Gigabit expect main router to LAN switch (10G with SFP+DAC).
One ISP requires PPPoE.
For the other ISP, I don't know yet how WAN connection is set up.
Each WAN connection should provide 700M/s for download and 100Mb/s for upload.
Those WAN connections are mostly used for Internet surfing (downloading, Youtube/netflix streaming, ...).
In my lab, I can configure VM Guest to "simulate" WAN endpoints or WiFi AP.
My goal is to make sure that "my router and switch do not introduce a bottleneck" as I foresee WAN and WiFi connections to be the weakest links.
1. From experience, would you say that a a router, acting as a PPPoE client as a meaningful impact on end-to-end performance (as opposed to just setting fixed IP addresses to WAN ports) ?
In other words, shall I care about replicating exact target WAN setup ?
Of course, in my testing, I'll keep router main tasks (NATing, firewalling, ...).
2. My VM environment is based on KVM/QEMU. Which Network Device Model (virtio, e1000, ...) do you recommend ? Any tip on KVM network tuning ?
3. How many VMs shall I set to replicate APs ? Does it matter to use a single VM instead of several VMs, each connected to a different switch port ?
4. Which tool (iperf, ...) do you recommend to generate representative load ?
5. What do you think of tools included in RouterOS distribution ? Can I use them to generate 1Gb/s traffic, for instance ?
6. Suggestions ?