In my filter rules, 0 is commented as "special dummy rule to show fasttrack counters", with chain being "forward". Rule 1 is "defconf: accept established, related, untracked", with chain being "input".
At rule 9 is "defconf: accept established, related, untracked", with chain being "forward". Would it give better speed for large amounts of related data if Rule 9 was moved to become Rule 1? It seems that established related packets would not need to go past rule 1 to be forwarded, and thus established, related packets would not be "tested" against the subsequent rules. If this would give more throughput, how can I move a Rule in WinBox? Or, alternatively, how can I "insert" a Rule between Rule 0 and Rule 1? Thanks for your input!