maybe a nonsense, but try to disable the LCD on rb2011 ..The conf are exactly identical ..cut..
how can I do ?maybe a nonsense, but try to disable the LCD on rb2011 ..The conf are exactly identical ..cut..
not a package, look at the menu item LCD..how can I do ?
The very first test shows interesting results... stay tuned I will post them latermaybe a nonsense, but try to disable the LCD on rb2011 ..The conf are exactly identical ..cut..
The very first test shows interesting results... stay tuned I will post them latermaybe a nonsense, but try to disable the LCD on rb2011 ..The conf are exactly identical ..cut..
as i told.. a nonsense ..but it worksThe very first test shows interesting results... stay tuned I will post them latermaybe a nonsense, but try to disable the LCD on rb2011 ..
The problem is definitely the LCD. If I disable them I get very fast speed
you posted it in the wrong topic:hey where is my post?
What exactly is the problem? 280-300 Mbps NAT on an RB2011 is quite good and about the max you should expect from such a device.Have the similar problem with rb2011 - 1Gbps copper connection from ISP, up to 25 simple firewall rules, NAT masquerade and as result only 280-300 Mbps NAT throughput from WAN to LAN with 100% CPU load. Turning off/on LED as metioned above dose nothing.
Any suggestions how to fix it? I was told that the only possible way is to sell rb2011 and buy ubiquiti edge 3 router?
The problem is that I thought that I bought a 1 Gbps routing device but received a 0,3 Gbps crap.What exactly is the problem? 280-300 Mbps NAT on an RB2011 is quite good and about the max you should expect from such a device.
Why should I buy a $300-$400 Mikrotik device if on the market exist devices capable of 1Gbps NAT throughput priced below $100?If you need more performance, buy a faster device from MikroTik. They have one to fit almost any situation! If you need 1Gbps NAT I would recommend getting a small CCR or maybe the 1100AHx2.
Googled already. Results are acceptable for me especially for the price. http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/l ... outer-liteYou could go to a UBNT Edge router, but it has it's own limitations and problems. So do the research before you do, because it uses hardware acceleration if you use anything outside of it, it's performance will become worse then the RB2011.
Actually my question was about RB2011 but not about RB1100 where you moved my post.you posted it in the wrong topic:
up to 0.3 Gbps but nothing moreThe problem is definitely the LCD. If I disable them I get very fast speed
I did not move your post. You posted it there youself.Actually my question was about RB2011 but not about RB1100 where you moved my post.you posted it in the wrong topic:up to 0.3 Gbps but nothing moreThe problem is definitely the LCD. If I disable them I get very fast speed
I'm sorry but I do not agree with this statement. This device does exactly (and often more) then is stated on the product page. You are confusing routing performance with NAT. A Mikrotik device is very diverse in what it can do and depending on what features you are planning to use you need to select the appropriate model.The problem is that I thought that I bought a 1 Gbps routing device but received a 0,3 Gbps crap.What exactly is the problem? 280-300 Mbps NAT on an RB2011 is quite good and about the max you should expect from such a device.
Yes I know that the throughput of the most network devices is lower than advertised. But 3 times lower than advertised is too much. This is unfair and should be noted at the product page.
Uh oh sorry, Could you move my message and answers to my message here please.I did not move your post. You posted it there youself.
RB2011 is positioned as a SOHO router. For such devices NAT performance is one of the key features. If NATing is not the part of the routing then what is it? A SFP port looks especially crappy on such low performace device.You are confusing routing performance with NAT.
I can access to the Internet without router at all and what? Firewall and NAT are basic functionality used to connect small LAN to the Internet safely so providing product info in sly way at the product page is the nothing more than unfair advertising. It won't help gain you more returning customers guys.you can do routing without any NAT
I repeat in SOHO segment NAT throughput is the main feature and you know it. Yeah the functionality is great and even unnesesarily exsessive for SOHO but CPU is too slow or the software is unoptimised.The device can do more than just NAT. It can do bridging, switching, routing, and also NAT.
Standard packet size in most cases is around 1500 bits so I expected at least 698.0 Mbps router throughput as stated in lowest line of the table.As you can see in the table, which is on the bottom of this page, the average speed for routing with some firewall or NAT rules is 300-400Mbit for average size packets: http://routerboard.com/RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN
It should show at least 0.7-0.8 Gbps NAT througput if it named a Gigabit router for SOHO.Just that a device has 1GBit ports doesn't mean that this is the speed you will get in any configuration.
To use torrent is also not that accurate. Better use iperf. It can test TCP,UDP and all kind of packet sizes with multiple dataflows. BTW i love the 2011. performance is in an expected area for the used CPU. i Just would like to see at least 1 more SFP port.speedtest.net uses TCP connection and not the large packet. you should do the test with UDP Torrent traffic if you want to see the 1500 packet result
iperf+nat+1Gbps+rb2011=0.3Gbs crapBetter use iperf.
test through the router? from where to where, and if posible, please post the settings, so we can see the packet size and protocoliperf+nat+1Gbps+rb2011=0.3Gbs crapBetter use iperf.
NAT is a CPU hungry task. What have you expected from the CPU build in the 2011? You can't but a scooter and expect racing car speed.iperf+nat+1Gbps+rb2011=0.3Gbs crapBetter use iperf.
If you do not wish to understand, that is fine, but please stop blaming the product for your lack of knowledge or investigating. If you are just going to throw advice and explanations into the wind, don't bother.iperf+nat+1Gbps+rb2011=0.3Gbs crapBetter use iperf.
once something in the firewall is on fastpath is off, even if there are only firewallrules in the INPUT chain. only with fastpath on forwarding traffic is really fast.I would say that if you do not use srcnat or dstnat rules, the nat is off. Generally no rules in nat means no nat.
You can use forward, input, output chain or your custom chain rules independently from having or not having nat.
If you do not want any forwarding rules, it is better to turn ports from routing mode to switching mode and take care just about input chain.
Hope I am not wrong.
From now at the every computer forum I ever registered I will reveal that MIKROTIK ARE SLY LIERS and their products sucks.If you do not wish to understand, that is fine, but please stop blaming the product for your lack of knowledge or investigating.
Dont make me laugh. Quite clear the TP-LINK are in describing their products. An example: http://www.tp-link.com/lk/products/deta ... R6120#specRouterboard is quite clear about performance on their website
Ok, so why then don't they list their routing speed and capabilities? Can you switch the 2 LAN ports? What is the forwarding rate between the Gigabit ports and as what can you configure them anyway? Where is the block diagram showing the linked ports and performance of those links? Or any supported routing protocols for that matter (oh wait, it supports RIP, wow!). It can do 60000 concurrent sessions (Not great, not horrible either), but what is it's packet forwarding rate? :SFrom now at the every computer forum I ever registered I will reveal that MIKROTIK ARE SLY LIERS and their products sucks.If you do not wish to understand, that is fine, but please stop blaming the product for your lack of knowledge or investigating.Dont make me laugh. Quite clear the TP-LINK are in describing their products. An example: http://www.tp-link.com/lk/products/deta ... R6120#specRouterboard is quite clear about performance on their website