Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
rado3105
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 492
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Thu Oct 15, 2015 7:27 pm

I have one wireless link, I tryed to make eoip tunnel over it.
Without tunnel it has throughoutput 70mbit/s. Over tunnel EOIP it has throughoutput in TCP just 38Mbit/s. in UDP throughotput is same with or without tunnel.

MTU is everywhere set on 1542. I tryed it on various wireless links, so it has nothing to do with noise....

What is the problem?
 
yancho
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: LV

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Thu Oct 15, 2015 8:45 pm

Use VPLS less overhead and not CPU intensive
 
User avatar
StubArea51
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1739
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: stubarea51.net
Contact:

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Mon Oct 19, 2015 7:44 pm

Sounds like you may have an MTU issue....we have done up to 10 Gbps of TCP traffic over EoIP.

http://www.stubarea51.net/2015/10/16/10 ... ip-tunnel/
 
yancho
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: LV

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Tue Oct 20, 2015 5:17 pm

IPANetEngineer seriously? 10 Gbps over wireless? :D
 
User avatar
StubArea51
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1739
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: stubarea51.net
Contact:

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Tue Oct 20, 2015 6:04 pm

Sure why not? Although not all of us are hardcore wireless guys. :-)

We do a bunch of data center and wireline service provider work in addition to WISPs and the data center guys use 10 gig like it's going out of style. 40 gig is about to be the new baseline for server connectivity in big data centers and 100 gig isn't too far away.

As for wireless, you can do 10 gig in wireless if you aggregate enough 1 gig backhauls and in some places that's way cheaper than buying 10 gigs of fiber transit.
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 675
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:00 am

Use VPLS less overhead and not CPU intensive
and more manageable, usually :)
 
rado3105
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 492
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Fri Oct 30, 2015 7:20 pm

I am using GRE tunnels, works great, simple....also MTU size ideal for all routerboards...
 
User avatar
StubArea51
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1739
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: stubarea51.net
Contact:

Re: Eoip link 40% lower throughoutput than link without EOIP, in TCP

Fri Oct 30, 2015 8:12 pm

GRE is good as well but it really depends on whether or not you need Layer 2 or Layer 3 in your design. EoIP is popular because it is a very inexpensive way to extend a Layer 2 network and get decent speeds without the complexity of MPLS.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andrewrmack and 63 guests