Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
ChanukaD
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:09 am

MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Thu Dec 21, 2017 1:07 pm

Hi all,

I want to build a mpls te tunnel between our two edges. these two edges are connected to our core router. All 3 routers are MPLS enabled and running. OSPF running as IGP. I have attached the diagram for your reference. I have followed this mikrotik documetation ( https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Simple_TE#) and my tunnel is not established. Path state is on hold. Is there any configurations I need to done in cisco router also ? What could cause tunnels to not come up ?

Thanks.

Image
 
User avatar
Anumrak
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:53 pm

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Fri Dec 22, 2017 9:47 am

TE tunnel is a simplex connection. You need to run in at the other side too. From A to B and from B to A. This is one tunnel. And it's not realy a tunnel. It's not encapsulating anything, it's just gather info about available resources on net.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established  [SOLVED]

Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:32 pm

You need to run RSVP protocol on cisco interfaces too, otherwise resource reservation along the path will not be possible.
Also depending on what Te tunnel path type you are using, if CSPF is used then you also need to configure OSPF on Cisco to work with CSPF
 
User avatar
Anumrak
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:53 pm

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Mon Dec 25, 2017 10:38 am

You need to run RSVP protocol on cisco interfaces too, otherwise resource reservation along the path will not be possible.
Also depending on what Te tunnel path type you are using, if CSPF is used then you also need to configure OSPF on Cisco to work with CSPF
Thats too.
 
ChanukaD
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:09 am

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Tue Dec 26, 2017 3:21 am

You need to run RSVP protocol on cisco interfaces too, otherwise resource reservation along the path will not be possible.
Also depending on what Te tunnel path type you are using, if CSPF is used then you also need to configure OSPF on Cisco to work with CSPF
Thank you very much ! After enable RSVP in cisco routers it works.
 
User avatar
dgonzalezh
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:39 am
Location: Colombia
Contact:

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:53 pm

You need to run RSVP protocol on cisco interfaces too, otherwise resource reservation along the path will not be possible.
Also depending on what Te tunnel path type you are using, if CSPF is used then you also need to configure OSPF on Cisco to work with CSPF
Thank you very much ! After enable RSVP in cisco routers it works.
Hi,

Sorry to hijack and revive this thread but how did you enable RSVP on the cisco interfaces?
I have something like this on my setup and am facing the problem you stated initially, only difference is that i have two cisco routers as core LSRs.

both 2821s look like this
4405352 luis lison

!
hostname MPLS_P03
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
ip cef
!
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
mpls label range 300000 399999
mpls label protocol ldp
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.255.255.103 255.255.255.255
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 description "A MPLS_P04"
 mtu 2000
 bandwidth 1000000
 ip address 192.168.206.101 255.255.255.252
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 mpls traffic-eng tunnels
 mpls label protocol ldp
 mpls ip
 ip rsvp bandwidth 100000
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 description "A CCR_PE01"
 mtu 2000
 bandwidth 1000000
 ip address 192.168.206.105 255.255.255.252
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 mpls traffic-eng tunnels
 mpls label protocol ldp
 mpls ip
 ip rsvp bandwidth 100000
!
router ospf 65530
 mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
 mpls traffic-eng area 0
 router-id 10.255.255.103
 network 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.206.100 0.0.0.3 area 0
 network 192.168.206.104 0.0.0.3 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
mpls ldp router-id Loopback0
!
If you could share your setup, thanks.
 
ChanukaD
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:09 am

Re: MPLS-TE tunnels not established

Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:26 am

You need to run RSVP protocol on cisco interfaces too, otherwise resource reservation along the path will not be possible.
Also depending on what Te tunnel path type you are using, if CSPF is used then you also need to configure OSPF on Cisco to work with CSPF
Thank you very much ! After enable RSVP in cisco routers it works.
Hi,

Sorry to hijack and revive this thread but how did you enable RSVP on the cisco interfaces?
I have something like this on my setup and am facing the problem you stated initially, only difference is that i have two cisco routers as core LSRs.

both 2821s look like this
4405352 luis lison

!
hostname MPLS_P03
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
ip cef
!
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
mpls label range 300000 399999
mpls label protocol ldp
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.255.255.103 255.255.255.255
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 description "A MPLS_P04"
 mtu 2000
 bandwidth 1000000
 ip address 192.168.206.101 255.255.255.252
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 mpls traffic-eng tunnels
 mpls label protocol ldp
 mpls ip
 ip rsvp bandwidth 100000
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 description "A CCR_PE01"
 mtu 2000
 bandwidth 1000000
 ip address 192.168.206.105 255.255.255.252
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 mpls traffic-eng tunnels
 mpls label protocol ldp
 mpls ip
 ip rsvp bandwidth 100000
!
router ospf 65530
 mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
 mpls traffic-eng area 0
 router-id 10.255.255.103
 network 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.206.100 0.0.0.3 area 0
 network 192.168.206.104 0.0.0.3 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
mpls ldp router-id Loopback0
!
If you could share your setup, thanks.
Hi there,

you need to configure rsvp configurations under the interface of core LSRs
mpls.PNG
Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dioeyandika and 36 guests