Hi there!

i have this situation:
PTP1:
192.168.1.1/29 (on AP)
192.168.1.2/29 (on CL)
192.168.1.3/29 (on RB1)
192.168.1.4/29 (on RB2)

PTP2:
192.168.2.1/29
192.168.2.2/29
192.168.2.3/29
192.168.2.4/29

AP1 and AP2 (BLUE):
192.168.10.1/29 (on AP1)
192.168.10.2/29 (on AP2)
192.168.10.3/29 (on RB2)

AP1 and AP2 (RED):
192.168.11.1/29 (on AP1)
192.168.11.2/29 (on AP2)
192.168.11.3/29 (on RB2)

AP1 and AP2 (GREEN):
192.168.20.1/29 (on AP1)
192.168.20.2/29 (on AP2)
192.168.20.3/29 (on RB3)

*RB2 has 2 EoIP tunnel, one per BLUE STUFF, one for RED STUFF.... each EoIP terminate on my remote EoIP server
*RB3 has 1 EoIP tunnel for green stuff

*EoIP interfaces on RBs are in bridge, each one with ethernet of the APs


In my case ptp1 has cost 10 (in OSPF interfaces) and ptp2 has cost 20

that's ok. All my traffic of RB2 goes through ptp1, both AP+EOIP BLUE traffic, and AP+EOIP RED traffic

use only ptp2 if ptp1 faills. Everything's work fine.


Bu now, my new request, is split one EoIP tunnel for ptp1, and one EoIP tunnel for ptp2....

i tried with mark traffic (mark routing), but for sure i wrong something...

Could you someone explain me a good way to solve?

thx guys

[edit]
in my new case, obv i don't want more a backup and so routing cost should be same on every route distance