Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:00 pm

Am I wrong or there is no way to change frame priority to IPv6 packets through firewall mangle?

I need to prioritize VoIP traffic on wireless interfaces, using NV2. For IPv4 I am using a firewall mangle rule that matches DSCP-EF (46) and sets priority 5. But I don't know how to do the same thing with IPv6 (and if it's possible).

Any advice?
 
marcof
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:50 pm

Re: IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:35 pm

Hi,

Just came around the same problem. I need to set 802.1p priority for ipv4 and ipv6 traffic. Is there any news on this missing feature? How did you work around this?

thanks
Marco
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Wed Feb 05, 2014 12:02 am

I see that in v6.9 this feature is still missing. Is it possible that we are the only two who would use it?
 
TonyJr
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:30 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:20 pm

Hmm I also see this difference in mangle rules between v4 and v6. It may cause problems with QoS on IPv6 packets when they are forwarded on in the network, if the other devices do not use DSCP, but only CoS.

Maybe it is on the 'drawing board', but not implemented entirely yet.

Tony
 
mbeauverd
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:46 am

Re: IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:25 pm

Any news about that ?

I need to set priority for IPv6 as well !!!
 
eee3
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: IPv6 mangle action: SET PRIORITY

Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:12 am

Sad to see that this still hasn't been implemented.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests