Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
ropix
Trainer
Trainer
Topic Author
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:42 am
Location: behind IP>firewall
Contact:

Cisco is opening up its EIGRP as open standard

Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:07 pm

I have heard the good news from Cisco, that they already announce that EIGRP routing protocol that previously become Cisco proprietary will become open standard.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collate ... 26299.html

Its mean that RouterOS can put this routing protocol on the next release :D
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Cisco is opening up its EIGRP as open standard

Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:09 pm

I would like to see this implemented as well.

I certainly don't want to use it internally, but we do have customers that have asked for it as a PE-CE protocol for L3VPN.

--Eric
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: bit.ly/the-qos
Contact:

Re: Cisco is opening up its EIGRP as open standard

Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:41 pm

 
User avatar
StubArea51
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1739
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: stubarea51.net
Contact:

Re: Cisco is opening up its EIGRP as open standard

Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:04 pm

I was very excited about this until I read that they won't be releasing advanced features like stub areas. It will still be much better than redistributing, and i'm very excited about the prospect of MikroTik implementing it in the future.

Good article about it here:

http://packetpushers.net/why-is-cisco-b ... pen-eigrp/
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: bit.ly/the-qos
Contact:

Re: Cisco is opening up its EIGRP as open standard

Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:30 pm

Hmmm so what Cisco are doing is setting a challenge for the world's reverse-engineers? To see if the EIGRP could be fully open-sourced by not looking at Cisco's source code but just ripped spec, compiled code and the packets on the wire?

Well if an open-source project starts existing, which contains 'undocumented' features and claims at least some compatibility, is it going to be legal-enough?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests