How about CCR1009?
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:37 pm
Thanks for the feedback.
What about the CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+? I know it has only 9 cores compared to the CCR1016, but do I really benefit from that when I'm only going to be able to use 1 core any way? I assume each core on these babies is the same on all models with the same clock speed?
The CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ has availability in my area, and the price is reasonable. The 1016 has no stock which means I would need to go for the more expensive 1036 and I'm not sure I need all those cores.
I assume then I should have no issue with 2x ISP with full routing tables on a single CCR1009? Actually I will probably do more static routing any way as our routes have very different costs. Static routes will help us manage our costs better. Mix of BGP full routing tables with some static in there.
As I am looking for about 4 - 6 units, I was wondering about the RB1100 models too. Are they any good for BGP? What do I lose from these in terms of routing performance?
Thanks again.
What about the CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+? I know it has only 9 cores compared to the CCR1016, but do I really benefit from that when I'm only going to be able to use 1 core any way? I assume each core on these babies is the same on all models with the same clock speed?
The CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ has availability in my area, and the price is reasonable. The 1016 has no stock which means I would need to go for the more expensive 1036 and I'm not sure I need all those cores.
I assume then I should have no issue with 2x ISP with full routing tables on a single CCR1009? Actually I will probably do more static routing any way as our routes have very different costs. Static routes will help us manage our costs better. Mix of BGP full routing tables with some static in there.
As I am looking for about 4 - 6 units, I was wondering about the RB1100 models too. Are they any good for BGP? What do I lose from these in terms of routing performance?
Thanks again.