Let me make sure I understand what you want. You want untagged traffic over a LAG. When I was testing a LAG on two of my switches, I think I tested that and it worked fine. I don't see any reason that it would not.
we have a remote site, where for geographical reasons we arrive with radio links. for a question of capacity, 2 links were placed.
Side A, as seen in the graph, the radios are directly connected to the RB1036, where we create a Bonding in BALANCE mode rr.
Side B as it is in the graph, the Radios first reach a CRS317 switch, and each port is untagged in a vlan 100 and 110. Because from that CRS 317 there is a 10g link to a CCR1036.
In this we create a Bonding with the Vlan 100 and 110 in Balance rr mode.
But our problem is that we need to have management of the radios, but from each condo router we ping the radios we lose half of the packets, it is understandable because of the issue of (bonding rr) when we want it to be 802.3 nothing works. I understand that it may be because when in Router A We create the bondig errl CRS317 It listens and automatically creates the bonding, which would not be a problem, if I could put that bondig untagged in a vlan, and it will not be necessary to create the bonding in the router B.
any help. Thanks!!!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.