Hi to everyone,
I would to know if there is a way to have 2 vlan as an access port (untagged) on a single interface in 6.42.9 (new swtich implementation)
Thanks for support!
/interface ethernet switch rule
add switch=switch1 ports=ether7 src-mac-address=00:0B:82:00:00:00/FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF new-vlan-id=20
Via an unmanaged switch, what does the ether port see in terms of MAC traffic? Would it see mac addresses associated with local devices, or would it see mac addresses of the switch ports of locally connected devices, or would it see the mac address of the its own switch port connected to ether4?
I don't see a way, on my MikroTik devices, to differentiate by mac address.
I need to reach two different subnet with different vlanID on same broadcast domain, I need to do that temporarily before to route the subnet. I've read on some cisco forum that someone has achived this solution.What are you trying to accomplish, without discussing solution space or design space or switch functionality.
I wouldn't call that a solution, I would call it a misconfiguration.I need to reach two different subnet with different vlanID on same broadcast domain, I need to do that temporarily before to route the subnet. I've read on some cisco forum that someone has achived this solution.
Wouldn't this be the solution? Take two unused ports, configure their untagged vids to the two vids in question, and then bridge them with an ethernet cable? This would forward each vlan's traffic to the other one. It's a dirty hack, but the OP mentioned it being only temporary anyway.Isn't that what happens when someone makes a mistake and connects a cable between two access ports configured in different vlans on two different switches?